ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021
Employing Cross-Species Approaches to Construct Humanized Genetic Interaction Networks.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Characterizing genetic interactions in humans, including synthetic lethal interactions, can provide fundamental insight into protein functions and pathway interactions. However, it can also assist in the development of innovative therapeutic strategies by uncovering novel drug targets used to combat diseases like cancer. To expedite the discovery of novel synthetic lethal interactions in humans, cross-species candidate gene approaches rely on the evolutionary conservation of genetic interactions between organisms. Here, we provide a guide that couples bioinformatic approaches and publicly available datasets from model organisms with cross-species approaches to expedite the identification of candidate synthetic lethal interactions to test in humans. First, we detail a method to identify relevant genetic interactions in budding yeast and subsequently provide a prioritization scheme to identify the most promising yeast interactions to pursue. Finally, we provide details on the tools and approaches used to identify the corresponding human orthologs to ultimately generate a testable network of candidate human synthetic lethal interactions. In summary, this approach leverages publicly available resources and datasets to expedite the identification of conserved synthetic lethal interactions in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34590273What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.