Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34590220›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2021

Getting Clear About Rectal Douching Among Men Who Have Sex With Men.

Christian Grov, Drew Westmoreland, Pedro B Carneiro, Jose A Bauermeister, Adam W Carrico

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christian GrovCUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, New York, NY, USA. cgrov@sph.cuny.edu.
Drew WestmorelandCUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, New York, NY, USA.
Pedro B CarneiroDepartment of Community Health and Social Sciences, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, 55 W. 125th St., 7th Floor mailroom, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Jose A BauermeisterDepartment of Family & Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Adam W CarricoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.

Funding

Patient and Population Health Outcomes Research SWGP30AI124414 · NIAID · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI Vinayaka R. Prasad · 2017 to 2026
$28.3M
Following a U.S. National Cohort of Vulnerable Men to Improve HIV Prevention and CareUH3AI133675 · NIAID · GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH POLICY · PI GROV, CHRISTIAN · 2019 to 2021
$6.9M
Following a U.S. National Cohort of Vulnerable Men to Improve HIV Prevention and CareUG3AI133675 · NIAID · GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH POLICY · PI GROV, CHRISTIAN · 2017 to 2018
$2.6M
Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases UH3 AI 133675NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI124414NIAID NIH HHS UG3 AI133675NIAID NIH HHS UH3 AI133675NIH HHS ERC CFAR, P30 AI124414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Receptive anal sex is the primary means through which HIV is transmitted among men who have sex with men (MSM). Recently, researchers have begun investigating the role that rectal douching may play in amplifying risk for transmission. Yet, there is limited research on the frequency with which MSM douche, the products they use, and how this may vary across sociodemographic characteristics. A U.S. national sample of 4745 MSM completed an online survey that assessed their douching behavior, demographic characteristics, sexual behavior, and their anal sexual positioning (i.e., top, bottom, versatile). Nearly two-thirds (65.8%) had engaged in rectal douching in the last three months. Among those who douched, water was commonly reported (84.2%) and 20.1% reported using commercial enemas (e.g., Fleet), as well as water and soap (15.0%)-numbers exceed 100% as some participants reported more than one. Men who douched reported significantly more receptive and insertive condomless anal sex acts in the prior 3 months. One-in-ten men reported rectal bleeding after douching. Compared to HIV-negative participants who had not taken PrEP, participants had higher odds of reporting douching in the past 3 months if they were HIV-negative and currently on PrEP (AOR = 1.82), HIV-negative and previously used PrEP (AOR = 1.58), and HIV-positive (AOR = 1.83). Douching was common in this sample. Given that douching could amplify risk for HIV transmission, healthcare providers should discuss douching safety with their patients, with a focus on harm reduction (e.g., reduce risk of bleeding, as opposed to abstinence from douching).

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSexual and Gender MinoritiesHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleSexual BehaviorTherapeutic IrrigationAnal sexual roleHIV riskMen who have sex with menRectal douchingSexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID34590220
PMCPMC9753552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.