Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34590205›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2022

Cancer survivorship care for young adults: a risk-stratified, multicenter randomized controlled trial to improve symptoms.

Karen L Syrjala, Casey A Walsh, Jean C Yi, Wendy M Leisenring, Emily Jo Rajotte, Jenna Voutsinas, Patricia A Ganz, Linda A Jacobs, Steven C Palmer, Ann Partridge and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02192333 (Young Adult Cancer Survivor Network Study of the Essential Elements of Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02192333 nacompletednot on this map

Young Adult Cancer Survivor Network Study of the Essential Elements of Care (YA-EEC-14)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterRan2015 to 2019Enrolled390ConditionsBreast Carcinoma, Cancer Survivor, Depression, FatigueArmsManagement of Therapy Complications, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Questionnaire Administration, Telephone-Based Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cancer survivorship programs at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pre-Surgery Inflammatory and Angiogenesis Biomarkers as Predictors of 12-Month Cancer-Related Distress: Results from the ColoCare Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Karen L SyrjalaClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, D5-22098109, USA. ksyrjala@fredhutch.org.
Casey A WalshClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, D5-22098109, USA.
Jean C YiClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, D5-22098109, USA.
Wendy M LeisenringClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, D5-22098109, USA.
Emily Jo RajotteClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, D5-22098109, USA.
Jenna VoutsinasClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, D5-22098109, USA.
Patricia A GanzUCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Linda A JacobsAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Steven C PalmerAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ann PartridgeDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
K Scott BakerClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, D5-22098109, USA.
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USUCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

Integrating health informatics in a scalable stepped care self-management program for survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantationR01CA215134 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BAKER, KEVIN S, MAJHAIL, NAVNEET S. · 2017 to 2022
$3.6M
Improving Survivorship Care for Adolescents and Young Adults: a Mixed Methods Study of Alignment with the National Standards for Survivorship CareU01CA246659 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BAKER, KEVIN S · 2020 to 2025
$3.6M
Biobehavioral Cancer Prevention and Control Training Program (BCPT)T32CA092408 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Margaret A Hannon · 2016 to 2026
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215134NCI NIH HHS T32 CA092408NCI NIH HHS U01 CA246659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeYoung adult (YA) cancer survivors have high rates of adverse health and psychosocial outcomes. This risk-stratified, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) compared a self-management survivorship intervention to usual care in YA survivors with symptoms of cancer-related distress, insomnia, fatigue, pain, and/or depression.

methodsEligibility included age 18-39 at diagnosis with an invasive malignancy in the previous 1-5 years. Baseline assessment determined "high need" participants, with 2-5 elevated targeted symptoms. We randomized high need participants to intervention or usual care and offered intervention participants a survivorship clinic visit, which included mutually decided action plans for symptoms. Follow-up calls at 1 and 3 months after the clinic visit reviewed action plan progress. Outcomes compared rates of improved symptoms for intervention vs usual care at 6 months and 12 months.

resultsN = 344 completed baseline assessment, with n = 147 (43%) categorized as high need and randomized. Of n = 73 randomized to the intervention, n = 42 (58%) did not attend their survivorship clinic visit. In intent-to-treat analyses, aggregate symptom scores did not differ between arms, though distress improved for 46% in the intervention arm at 6 months compared to 18% in usual care (p = 0.03) among those with elevated distress at baseline.

conclusionsDistress improved for YAs who received self-management survivorship care. However, the study demonstrates a need for alternative strategies for providing YA survivorship care.

trial registrationNCT02192333 IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: While YA survivors demonstrate some improved distress when provided survivorship care, to make care accessible and effective, they require options such as remote delivery of care.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultFatigueHumansQuality of LifeSelf CareSurvivorshipYoung AdultAYACancer survivorRandomized controlled trialRisk-stratifiedSurvivorship care planYoung adult

Identifiers

PMID34590205
PMCPMC9438455
OpenAlexW3204905977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.