Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34590178›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2022

Postoperative complications after a transthoracic esophagectomy or a transhiatal gastrectomy in patients with esophagogastric junctional cancers: a prospective nationwide multicenter study.

Shinji Mine, Yukinori Kurokawa, Hiroya Takeuchi, Masanori Terashima, Takushi Yasuda, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Hiroshi Yabusaki, Yasuhiro Shirakawa, Kazumasa Fujitani, Takeshi Sano and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of roboticChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Appetite-preserving gastrectomy (APG) for esophagogastric junction cancer: preserving the residual stomach as an endocrine organ.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Surgical and Perioperative Treatments for Esophagogastric Junction Cancer.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Shinji MineDepartment of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan. mineshinji921@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6232-3732
Yukinori KurokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroya TakeuchiDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Masanori TerashimaDivision of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Japan.
Takushi YasudaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuhiro YoshidaDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
Hiroshi YabusakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Yasuhiro ShirakawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Kazumasa FujitaniDepartment of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Takeshi SanoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yuko KitagawaDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Osaka · JPGifu University · JPHamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPJuntendo University · JPKeio University · JPKindai University · JPNiigata Cancer Center Hospital · JPOkayama University · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancers are resected thorough esophagectomy or gastrectomy, with the incidence of postoperative complications influenced by the chosen procedure.

methodsIn this prospective nationwide multicenter study, patients with cT2-T4 EGJ cancers were enrolled before surgery. Based on the protocol, surgeons performed a transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) or a transhiatal gastrectomy (THG) and dissected all lymph nodes prespecified as the standardized procedure. Postoperative complications were correlated with the clinical factors in each procedure.

resultsA total of 345 patients were eligible for this study. TTE and THG were performed in 120 and 225 patients, respectively. Complications of Clavien-Dindo ≥ Grade II were found in 115/345 (33.3%) patients. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was found only in the TTE group (p < 0.001). The incidence of other complications was not significantly different between the two groups. High body mass index (BMI) in the TTE group, male sex, and longer esophageal invasion in the THG group were significantly correlated with complications ≥ Grade II (p = 0.049, 0.037, and 0.019, respectively). Anastomotic leakage was most frequently observed (12.2%). Tumor size in the THG group (p = 0.02) was significantly associated with leakage. All six patients with ≥ Grade IV leakage underwent THG, whereas, none of the patients in the TTE group had leakage ≥ Grade IV (2.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.096).

conclusionsSurgical resection should be performed with utmost care, particularly in patients with a high BMI undergoing TTE, and in patients with larger tumors, longer esophageal invasion, or male patients undergoing THG.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsEsophagectomyEsophagogastric JunctionGastrectomyHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAdenocarcinomaAnastomotic leakageEsophagogastric junctionPostoperative complicationsSquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID34590178
OpenAlexW3203689925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.