Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34590063›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2021

Ischaemia-free liver transplantation in humans: a first-in-human trial.

Zhiyong Guo, Qiang Zhao, Shanzhou Huang, Changjun Huang, Dongping Wang, Lu Yang, Jian Zhang, Maogen Chen, Linwei Wu, Zhiheng Zhang and 26 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Advances in liver transplantation technology].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Machine perfusion of the liver: applications in transplantation and beyond.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhiyong GuoOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Qiang ZhaoOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Shanzhou HuangOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Changjun HuangOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Dongping WangOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Lu YangDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Jian ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Maogen ChenOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Linwei WuOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Zhiheng ZhangOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Zebin ZhuOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Linhe WangOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Caihui ZhuOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yixi ZhangOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yunhua TangOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Chengjun SunOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Wei XiongDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yuekun ShenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xiaoxiang ChenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Jinghong XuOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Tielong WangOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yi MaOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Anbin HuOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yinghua ChenOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xiaofeng ZhuOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Jian RongDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Changjie CaiSurgical Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Fengqiu GongOperating Room and Anaesthesia Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xiangdong GuanSurgical Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Wenqi HuangDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Dicken Shiu-Chung KoDepartment of Surgery, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Centre, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Xianchang LiOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Stefan G TulliusDivision of Transplant Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jiefu HuangOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Weiqiang JuOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xiaoshun HeOrgan Transplant Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNKey Laboratory of Guangdong Province · CNBrigham and Women's Hospital · USTufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Ischaemia-reperfusion injury is considered an inevitable component of organ transplantation, compromising organ quality and outcomes. Although several treatments have been proposed, none has avoided graft ischaemia and its detrimental consequences. Methods Ischaemia-free liver transplantation (IFLT) comprises surgical techniques enabling continuous oxygenated blood supply to the liver of brain-dead donor during procurement, preservation, and implantation using normothermic machine perfusion technology. In this non-randomised study, 38 donor livers were transplanted using IFLT and compared to 130 conventional liver transplants (CLT). Findings Two recipients (5•3%) in the IFLT group experienced early allograft dysfunction, compared to 50•0% in patients receiving conventional transplants (absolute risk difference, 44•8%; 95% confidence interval, 33•6-55•9%). Recipients of IFLT had significantly reduced median (IQR) peak aspartate aminotransferase levels within the first week compared to CLT recipients (365, 238-697 vs 1445, 791-3244 U/L, p<0•001); likewise, median total bilirubin levels on day 7 were significantly lower (2•34, 1•39-4•09 mg/dL) in the IFLT group than in the CLT group (5•10, 1•90-11•65 mg/dL) (p<0•001). Moreover, IFLT recipients had a shorter median intensive care unit stay (1•48, 0•75-2•00 vs 1•81, 1•00-4•58 days, p=0•006). Both one-month recipient (97•4% vs 90•8%, p=0•302) and graft survival (97.4% vs 90•0%, p=0•195) were better for IFLT than CLT, albeit differences were not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis showed that the extended criteria donor livers transplanted using the IFLT technique yielded faster post-transplant recovery than did the standard criteria donor livers transplanted using the conventional approach. Interpretation IFLT provides a novel approach that may improve outcomes, and allow the successful utilisation of extended criteria livers. Funding This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory Construction Projection on Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, and Guangdong Provincial international Cooperation Base of Science and Technology. Panel: Research in context.

Identifiers

PMID34590063
PMCPMC8406025
OpenAlexW3196196794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.