ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2021
Efficacy and Safety of S-1 Compared With Docetaxel in Elderly Patients With Advanced NSCLC Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Subgroup Analysis of the EAST-LC Trial.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-World Efficacy and Safety of S-1 Monotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Management: Insights From a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite recent advances in NSCLC treatment, specific data on the elderly population remain limited. In this post hoc subgroup analysis of the East Asia S-1 Trial in Lung Cancer (EAST-LC) trial, we compared S-1 and docetaxel (DTX) in patients aged 70 years old and above with pretreated advanced NSCLC.
methodsPatients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive S-1 (orally, twice daily on d 1-28 of a 6-wk cycle) or DTX (intravenously, on d 1 of a 3-wk cycle). The initial S-1 dose was 80, 100, or 120 mg/day on the basis of body surface area, and the DTX doses were 60 mg/m
resultsAmong 189 patients aged 70 years and above assessed as the full analysis set, baseline characteristics were generally similar between treatment arms. The median overall survival was 14.7 (S-1) versus 12.1 months (DTX); the hazard ratio was equal to 0.76, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.54-1.07. The median progression-free survival was similar in both arms (both 4.1 mo, hazard ratio = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.60-1.18); and the response rate was 12.9% (S-1) and 14.0% (DTX). The adjusted mean QOL score difference (S-1-DTX until wk 48) was 7.41 (95% CI: 0.37-14.46). Safety profiles were generally consistent with those of the overall EAST-LC population.
conclusionsS-1 revealed comparable efficacy, safety, and QOL versus DTX in pretreated elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Results were consistent with the overall EAST-LC data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.