ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2021
Real-World Evidence of Diagnostic Testing for Driver Oncogene Mutations in Lung Cancer in Japan.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retrospective database study of druggable mutation detection among patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Japan.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Real-world study of next-generation sequencing diagnostic biomarker testing for patients with lung cancer in Japan.Cancer science · 2023Observational
- Genomic Landscape of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in East Asia Using Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Clinical Practice.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDiagnostic testing is important in determining appropriate treatment for individuals with lung cancer. In 2018, testing of five biomarkers (
methodsThis descriptive, retrospective observational study used the Japan Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. (MDV), database (June 2017-November 2018) and covered data for
resultsOf 8323 patients with any biomarker test, 83.2% were tested for
conclusionsThis real-world evidence revealed variations in diagnostic testing patterns, which could affect time to treatment in Japan. Variations are likely influenced by individual biomarker prioritization considering limited tissue samples in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.