Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34589917›Full record

ReviewJTO clinical and research reports2020

Catalog of 5' Fusion Partners in

Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, Viola W Zhu, Misako Nagasaka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JTO clinical and research reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Patient With NovelJTO clinical and research reports · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Retrospective study of alectinib treatment among variants ofTranslational lung cancer research · 2026
    Article
  10. ALK Inhibitor Response in NovelJTO clinical and research reports · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sai-Hong Ignatius OuDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California.
Viola W ZhuDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California.
Misako NagasakaDepartment of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery of anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion-positive (

Indexed as

ALK fusion partnersALK+ NSCLCNext-generation sequencingWhole transcriptome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34589917
PMCPMC8474466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.