ArticleCritical care explorations2021
Explainable Machine Learning on AmsterdamUMCdb for ICU Discharge Decision Support: Uniting Intensivists and Data Scientists.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05497505 (Machine Learning in Intensive Care to Reduce Adverse Events, Complications, and Life-threatening Events), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Machine Learning in Intensive Care to Reduce Adverse Events, Complications, and Life-threatening Events (MIRACLE): Evaluation of Clinical Implementation of Machine Learning Based Decision Support for ICU Discharge
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- ICU readmission and mortality risk prediction: Generalizability of a multi-hospital model.Journal of intensive medicine · 2025Article
- Multicenter validation of a machine learning model to predict intensive care unit readmission within 48 hours after discharge.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Exploring timely and safe discharge from ICU: a comparative study of machine learning predictions and clinical practices.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- What is the future of artificial intelligence in obstetrics? A qualitative study among healthcare professionals.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Dynamic Prediction of Patient Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit: A Scoping Review of the State-of-the-Art.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2023Article
- Current challenges in adopting machine learning to critical care and emergency medicine.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Improving Intensive Care Unit Early Readmission Prediction Using Optimized and Explainable Machine Learning.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Intensive Care Unit Physicians' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Sepsis-induced coagulopathy is associated with new episodes of atrial fibrillation in patients admitted to critical care in sinus rhythm.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Demystifying the Black Box: The Importance of Interpretability of Predictive Models in Neurocritical Care.Neurocritical care · 2022Article
- Modern Learning from Big Data in Critical Care: Primum Non Nocere.Neurocritical care · 2022Article
- Development of a Risk Prediction Model for New Episodes of Atrial Fibrillation in Medical-Surgical Critically Ill Patients Using the AmsterdamUMCdb.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Evaluation of two large language models for intensive care unit discharge decisions: a prospective observational cohort study.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unexpected ICU readmission is associated with longer length of stay and increased mortality. To prevent ICU readmission and death after ICU discharge, our team of intensivists and data scientists aimed to use AmsterdamUMCdb to develop an explainable machine learning-based real-time bedside decision support tool. DERIVATION COHORT: Data from patients admitted to a mixed surgical-medical academic medical center ICU from 2004 to 2016. VALIDATION COHORT: Data from 2016 to 2019 from the same center. PREDICTION MODEL: Patient characteristics, clinical observations, physiologic measurements, laboratory studies, and treatment data were considered as model features. Different supervised learning algorithms were trained to predict ICU readmission and/or death, both within 7 days from ICU discharge, using 10-fold cross-validation. Feature importance was determined using SHapley Additive exPlanations, and readmission probability-time curves were constructed to identify subgroups. Explainability was established by presenting individualized risk trends and feature importance.
resultsOur final derivation dataset included 14,105 admissions. The combined readmission/mortality rate within 7 days of ICU discharge was 5.3%. Using Gradient Boosting, the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.75-0.81) and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.19 on the validation cohort (
conclusionsWe developed an explainable machine learning model that may aid in identifying patients at high risk for readmission and mortality after ICU discharge using the first freely available European critical care database, AmsterdamUMCdb. Impact analysis showed that a relative risk reduction of 14% could be achievable, which might have significant impact on patients and society. ICU data sharing facilitates collaboration between intensivists and data scientists to accelerate model development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.