Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34589695›Full record

ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2021

Microcurrent Therapy as a Therapeutic Modality for Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review Accelerating the Translation From Clinical Trials to Patient Care.

Hirotaka Iijima, Masaki Takahashi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hirotaka IijimaDepartment of System Design Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.
Masaki TakahashiDepartment of System Design Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.
Keio University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo summarize the level of knowledge regarding the effects of microcurrent therapy (MCT) on musculoskeletal pain in adults. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi database were searched from the time of their inception to December 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of MCT on musculoskeletal pain were included. Additionally, non-RCTs were included to assess the adverse events. DATA EXTRACTION: The primary outcomes were pain and adverse events related to MCT. To assess the reproducibility of MCT, we evaluated the completeness of treatment description using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. We also assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). DATA SYNTHESIS: A comprehensive assessment of 4 RCTs and 5 non-RCTs that met the inclusion criteria revealed that MCT significantly improved shoulder pain (1 study, 40 patients) and knee pain (1 study, 52 patients) compared with sham MCT without any severe adverse events. MCT has clinically significant benefits for knee pain. This study also revealed a clinically significant placebo response in treating knee pain. This evidence highlights the substantial effect of placebo response in clinical care. These treatment effects on knee pain are further supported by the high quality of evidence in GRADE with high reproducibility in TIDieR.

conclusionsThe findings of this meta-analysis highlight the effect of placebo response in treating knee pain. MCT is a potential, core nonpharmacologic treatment option in clinical care with minimal adverse events and should be further investigated. This study proposes a framework for the future investigation of the effect of MCT on musculoskeletal pain to enhance the study quality and reproducibility.

Indexed as

Electric stimulation therapyGRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and EvaluationLBP, low back painMCID, minimum clinically important differenceMCT, microcurrent therapyMeta-analysisMusculoskeletal painNSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugsPlacebo effectRCTs, randomized controlled trialsRehabilitationTIDieR, Template for Intervention Description and Replication

Identifiers

PMID34589695
PMCPMC8463469
OpenAlexW3187705268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.