ReviewCureus2021
Clinical Experience With Intramuscular Clozapine.
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Involuntary Clozapine Treatment: A Systematic Review.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2026Pooled it
- Effective and safe use of intramuscular clozapine in a patient presenting with catatonia and thrombocytopenia.BMJ case reports · 2024Article
- Alternative Routes of Administration of Clozapine.CNS drugs · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia, but many refuse to accept oral clozapine therapy. Intramuscular (IM) clozapine represents a convenient alternative for their treatment. The aim of this review is to summarize studies investigating IM clozapine administration. When initially developed, clozapine was also provided as an IM formulation, but the manufacturer later discontinued its production. Recently, IM clozapine became again available as an unlicensed product distributed by the Dutch company Apotheek A15. The use of IM clozapine has been reported in older studies on clozapine's adverse effects. It has also been described in detail in 5 more recent and generally smaller (n = 7 - 59) retrospective studies in patients refusing to take oral clozapine. In addition, its administration has been noted in 5 case reports. IM clozapine has been used at approximately ½ of the dose of oral clozapine due to pharmacokinetic considerations. It has been used in doses of up to 500 mg per day and for up to 99 days of treatment. The majority of patients (between 60 and 100%) were successfully transitioned to oral clozapine within a few days of IM treatment, and improvement in their condition was sustained during the long-term follow-up. Side effects of IM clozapine were similar to those of oral clozapine, but its sedative and cardiovascular effects (hypotension and tachycardia) had faster onset following IM administration. After long-term use, clozapine injections lead to local swelling and to the formation of painful nodules in some patients. In summary, IM clozapine may facilitate successful transition to oral clozapine in most patients, and it definitely represents a valuable tool for addressing refusal of oral clozapine in patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia. More studies, especially focused on its safety, are, however, needed to better understand the limitations of this novel treatment approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.