ArticleCureus2021
Innovative Pancreas Ligation Band for Distal Pancreatectomy: A Pilot In Vivo Porcine Study.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Ligation of the Pancreatic Stump With Quantified Force During Distal Pancreatectomy for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Protocol for a Single-Center Nonrandomized Controlled Clinical Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Pancreas Ligation Device for Distal Pancreatectomy: An Ex Vivo Follow-Up Porcine Study.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Although new techniques and devices have been introduced, the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy remains high. To reduce the risk of POPF, we developed an innovative ligation band and conducted this pilot study to assess the possibility of reducing the incidence of POPF and pancreatic necrosis after distal pancreatectomy. Methods Distal pancreatectomy was performed in three pigs. In two animals, ligation of the pancreas was performed while maintaining arterial blood flow to the stump, and in one animal, the arterial blood flow was occluded. After ligation, the pancreas was sharply divided. Animals were sacrificed seven days later, and the remnant pancreas was assessed histologically. POPF was defined as amylase in ascites > 3x the preoperative serum amylase level. The following equation was used to quantify the extent of necrotic tissue: necrotic tissue residual rate = necrotic tissue area/ cross-sectional area. Results All animals survived, and no POPF developed. For two animals in which arterial blood flow to the stump was maintained, necrotic tissue residual rates at the ligation line were 24% and 31%. At the pancreatic stump, necrotic tissue residual rates were 37% and 50%. In the animal in which arterial blood flow to the stump was occluded, the necrotic tissue residual rate at the ligation line was 83% and that at the pancreatic stump was 78%, both higher than that in animals in which arterial blood flow was maintained. In all animals, there was no injury to pancreatic tissue at the ligation line. Conclusion The pancreas ligation band can potentially prevent POPF after distal pancreatectomy by atraumatic ligation, and the band ligates the pancreatic stump while maintaining arterial blood flow and limiting pancreatic necrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.