Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34589364›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Post-Treatment Tumor Response in Rectal Carcinoma.

Pir Abdul Ahad Aziz Qureshi, Javaria Aleem, Nadia Mushtaq, Muhammad Asif Noor, Imran Khalid Niazi, Muhammad Omer Altaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pir Abdul Ahad Aziz QureshiDepartment of Radiology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.
Javaria AleemDepartment of Radiology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.
Nadia MushtaqDepartment of Radiology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.
Muhammad Asif NoorDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.
Imran Khalid NiaziDepartment of Radiology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.
Muhammad Omer AltafDepartment of Radiology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Rectal cancer has become a major cause of mortality worldwide. Imaging has a primary role in staging and assessing the response to therapy. MRI is superior to all other modalities in local staging of the rectal tumor and in predicting tumor response. Pelvic MRI has an undeniable role in the therapeutic management of rectal cancer, particularly for the determination of the circumferential resection margin (CRM), evaluation of sphincter invasion, and assessment of the extramural vascular invasion. Post-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) staging aims at assessing treatment response and choosing methods for further treatment such as surgical resection or extended CRT. MRI with diffusion restriction is a non-invasive and useful tool for assessing the treatment response of locally advanced lower rectal cancer. It will reduce the burden of extensive abdominoperineal resection (APR) surgery in patients. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the evaluation of post-treatment tumor response in rectal carcinoma. Materials and methods The study was approved by our institutional review board, which waived the requirement for informed consent. The clinical data of all the patients treated for rectal carcinoma at the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore between February 1, 2014, and February 28, 2019, were retrospectively evaluated. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with histopathologically proven rectal adenocarcinoma, (2) those who underwent APR before February 2019 at our hospital, and (3) those who underwent MRI including DWI/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) imaging before and after CRT. Those patients who had upfront surgery without neoadjuvant CRT and those who did not have MRI imaging with DWI/ADC were excluded from the study. Results A total of 200 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in this study. Among those, 141 were males and 59 were females. On histology, 110 had moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, 25 had well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, and 65 had poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas. Overall diagnostic accuracy of DWI MRI sequence was calculated to be 91%, while the sensitivity was 98.09%, specificity was 65.12%, positive predictive value was 91.12%, and negative predictive value was 90.32%. Conclusion DWI was proven to be very useful in the post-treatment evaluation of tumor response with very high diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

concurrent chemoradiotherapydiffusion-weighted imaging (dwi)mri rectumrectal cancertumor imaging

Identifiers

PMID34589364
PMCPMC8464380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.