ArticleCureus2021
Small Bowel in Vagina: A Case for Pelvic Exams.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Experience in the Management of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence and Evisceration: A Retrospective 37-Year Single-Center Study.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaginal cuff dehiscence with small bowel evisceration is a serious but uncommon postoperative complication of total laparoscopic hysterectomies. The severity of surgical site dehiscence can range from small, partial to full-thickness wound dehiscence, manifesting with acute abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, or discharge, and is often precipitated by sexual intercourse. While imaging, including a pelvic ultrasound and computed tomography (CT), may help in undifferentiated acute abdominal pain, vaginal cuff dehiscence remains a clinical diagnosis found on physical exam. Because vaginal cuff dehiscence is a clinical diagnosis, sparse data exist regarding radiographic sensitivities and specificities in the identification of vaginal cuff dehiscence. Despite the increasing literature suggesting that pelvic exams are invasive with often limited utility, the authors argue that pelvic exams remain essential in identifying complications of hysterectomies. The authors present a case of a 40-year-old woman with acute abdominal pain found to have loops of small bowel in the vaginal vault, discovered only on physical exam after negative CT and ultrasound imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.