ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2021
Design of an international investigator-initiated study on MOdern Treatment of Inhibitor-positiVe pATiEnts with haemophilia A (MOTIVATE).
Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04023019 (MOdern Treatment of Inhibitor-PositiVe PATiEnts With Haemophilia A - An International Observational Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
MOdern Treatment of Inhibitor-PositiVe PATiEnts With Haemophilia A - An International Observational Study
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emicizumab enables rapid tolerance, reducing bleeding during low-dose ITI in pediatric hemophilia A.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2026Article
- Evaluating clinically translatable conditioning for platelet gene therapy in murine hemophilia A with inhibitors.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2024Article
- Simoctocog alfa (NuwiqTherapeutic advances in hematology · 2024Review
- Factor VIII inhibitors in hemophilia A treated with emicizumab: longitudinal follow-up of outcomes.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023Article
- Low Bone Mineral Density in Hemophiliacs.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Hemophilia a patients with inhibitors: Mechanistic insights and novel therapeutic implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInhibitor development is the most serious treatment-related complication of replacement coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) therapy for patients with haemophilia A. Immune tolerance induction (ITI), which involves intensive and prolonged treatment with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII, is the only clinically proven strategy for eradication of inhibitors. The bispecific antibody emicizumab is approved for use in patients with and without inhibitors to prevent bleeding but does not eliminate inhibitors. MOTIVATE (www.motivate-study.com) aims to capture different approaches to the treatment and management of patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors, document current ITI approaches from real-world clinical experience, and evaluate the efficacy and safety of ITI, emicizumab prophylaxis and ITI with emicizumab prophylaxis.
methodsThe investigator-initiated MOTIVATE study [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04023019; EudraCT 2019-003427-38] will investigate in real-life clinical practice the management of patients with haemophilia A of any severity who have developed inhibitors to FVIII. All treatment is at the investigator's discretion. The following treatment approaches will be evaluated: Group 1 - ITI with Nuwiq
conclusionsIt is planned to enrol 120 patients who will be followed for up to 5 years. Optional sub-studies will explore factors that may influence ITI results as well as the impact of different treatment approaches on important aspects of patient health, including joint and bone health and the risk of thrombotic events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.