Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34589176›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2021

Psychometric properties and validity of the German version of the Post-Traumatic Diagnostic Scale for DSM-5 (PDS-5).

Lutz Wittmann, Aleksandar Dimitrijevic, Anke Ehlers, Edna B Foa, Henrik Kessler, Julia Schellong, Markus Burgmer

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lutz WittmannDepartment of Psychology, International Psychoanalytic University, Berlin, Germany.
Aleksandar DimitrijevicDepartment of Psychology, International Psychoanalytic University, Berlin, Germany.
Anke EhlersDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8742-0192
Edna B FoaCenter for the Treatment and Study of Anxiety, University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, PA, USA.
Henrik KesslerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LWL-University Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Julia SchellongDepartment of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Markus BurgmerDepartment of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, LWL-Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The availability of psychometrically sound instruments for the assessment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is indispensable for clinical and scientific work with individuals suffering from trauma-related distress. Objective: The aim of the present study was to translate the Post-Traumatic Diagnostic Scale for DSM-5 (PDS-5) into German and to evaluate its psychometric properties as well as convergent, discriminant, and factorial validity. Method: The authorized German translation of the PDS-5 was completed by 270 patients admitted to specialized outpatient trauma clinics. Of these, 57.8% completed the PDS for a second time (mean time between assessments was 12.0 days). In order to examine convergent and discriminant validity of the PDS-5, the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 as well as Patient Health Questionnaire subscales assessing depression (PHQ-9), somatization (PHQ-15), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) were applied. Results: The PDS-5 total score showed excellent internal consistency (α = .91) and re-test reliability (rho = .84). Convergent validity was supported by a strong correlation with the total score of the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; rho = .91). Correlations with Patient Health Questionnaire subscales of depression (rho = .81), anxiety (rho = .72), and somatization (rho = .65) were significantly lower (all Conclusions: In summary, our results indicate that the German PDS-5 translation provides valid and reliable information concerning both PTSD severity and diagnosis.

Indexed as

TranslationsAdultChecklistDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFemaleGermanyHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSurveys and Questionnairesanálisis factorial confirmatorioassessmentconfirmatory factor analysisconvergent validitydiscriminant validityDSM-5 创伤后诊断量表 (PDS-5)Escala de diagnóstico postraumático del DSM-5 (PDS-5)evaluaciónGerman translationPost-traumatic Diagnostic Scale for DSM-5 (PDS-5)Post-Traumatic Stress DisorderTraducción al alemánTrastorno de estrés postraumáticovalidez convergentevalidez discriminante创伤后应激障碍区分效度德语翻译收敛效度评估验证性因素分析

Identifiers

PMID34589176
PMCPMC8475123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.