Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34589136›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021

Regularized Weighted Nonparametric Likelihood Approach for High-Dimension Sparse Subdistribution Hazards Model for Competing Risk Data.

Leili Tapak, Michael R Kosorok, Majid Sadeghifar, Omid Hamidi, Saeid Afshar, Hassan Doosti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leili TapakDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4378-3143
Michael R KosorokDepartment of Biostatistics, Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6070-9738
Majid SadeghifarDepartment of Statistics, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7854-0873
Omid HamidiDepartment of Science, Hamedan University of Medical Science, Hamedan 65155, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8721-3345
Saeid AfsharResearch Center for Molecular Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5136-4259
Hassan DoostiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0290-8122

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variable selection and penalized regression models in high-dimension settings have become an increasingly important topic in many disciplines. For instance, omics data are generated in biomedical researches that may be associated with survival of patients and suggest insights into disease dynamics to identify patients with worse prognosis and to improve the therapy. Analysis of high-dimensional time-to-event data in the presence of competing risks requires special modeling techniques. So far, some attempts have been made to variable selection in low- and high-dimension competing risk setting using partial likelihood-based procedures. In this paper, a weighted likelihood-based penalized approach is extended for direct variable selection under the subdistribution hazards model for high-dimensional competing risk data. The proposed method which considers a larger class of semiparametric regression models for the subdistribution allows for taking into account time-varying effects and is of particular importance, because the proportional hazards assumption may not be valid in general, especially in the high-dimension setting. Also, this model relaxes from the constraint of the ability to simultaneously model multiple cumulative incidence functions using the Fine and Gray approach. The performance/effectiveness of several penalties including minimax concave penalty (MCP); adaptive LASSO and smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) as well as their L

Indexed as

Likelihood FunctionsProportional Hazards ModelsStatistics, NonparametricAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansIncidenceModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalRisk FactorsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID34589136
PMCPMC8476266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.