Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34589115›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

Identification of Prognostic Biomarker Candidates Associated With Melanoma Using High-Dimensional Genomic Data.

Brody Kutt, Rachel Burdorf, Travaughn Bain, Nicardo Cameron, Alexia Pearah, Ersoy Subasi, David J Carroll, Lisa K Moore, Munevver Mine Subasi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brody KuttSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States.
Rachel BurdorfDepartment of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, United States.
Travaughn BainDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, United States.
Nicardo CameronDepartment of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, United States.
Alexia PearahDepartment of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, United States.
Ersoy SubasiCollege of Aeronautics, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, United States.
David J CarrollDepartment of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, United States.
Lisa K MooreDepartment of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, United States.
Munevver Mine SubasiDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, United States.
Florida Institute of Technology · USMidwestern University · USRochester Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival of patients with metastatic melanoma varies widely. Melanoma is a highly proliferative, chemo-resistant disease. With the recent availability of immunotherapies such as checkpoint inhibitors, durable response rates have improved but are often still limited to 2-3 years. Response rates to treatment range from 30 to 45% with combination therapy however no improvement in overall survival is frequently observed. Of the available therapies, many have targeted the BRAFV600E mutation that results in abnormal MAPK pathway activation which is important for regulating cell proliferation. Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 offer better success but response rates are still low. Identifying biomarkers to better target those who will respond and identify the right combination of treatment is the best approach. In this study, we utilize data from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), including 62 samples, to examine features of gene expression (19K+) and copy number (20K+) in the melanoma cell lines. We perform a clustering analysis on the feature set to assess genetically similarity among the cell lines. We then discover which specific genes and combinations thereof maximize cluster density. We design a feature selection approach for high-dimensional datasets that integrates multiple disparate machine learning techniques into one cohesive pipeline. Our approach provides a small subset of genes that can accurately distinguish between the clusters of melanoma cell lines across multiple types of classifiers. In particular, we find only the 15 highest ranked genes among the original 19 K are necessary to achieve perfect or near-perfect test split classification performance. Of these 15 genes, some are known to be linked to melanoma or other cancer progressions, while others have not previously been linked to melanoma and are of interest for further examination.

Indexed as

classificationclusteringfeature selectiongene expressionmachine learningmelanoma

Identifiers

PMID34589115
PMCPMC8473904
OpenAlexW3201107340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.