Editorial: Microbial Electrogenesis, Microbial Electrosynthesis, and Electro-bioremediation.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Innovative bioreactor designs for enhancing electron transfer, mass transfer, and product yields in microbial electrosynthesis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
   Review
2. Reinforcement of Microbial Electrolytic Cells by Redox Mediators Modified Carbon Felt Electrodes: Electrochemistry and Microbial Dynamics.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025
   Article
3. Groundwater electro-bioremediation via diffuse electro-conductive zones: A critical review.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2025
   Review
4. Editorial: Trends of microbial technologies in rehabilitation of contaminated environments.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as