Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34588840›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2021

Value drivers for pharmaceutical products in health technology assessment (HTA) in Saudi Arabia: Results from a capacity Building, Multi-Stakeholder workshop.

Hussain A Al-Omar, Ibrahim A Aljuffali, Oriol Solà-Morales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Real-world data: a comprehensive literature review on the barriers, challenges, and opportunities associated with their inclusion in the health technology assessment process.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Developing a medical-device formulary for council of health insurance beneficiaries in Saudi Arabia: stakeholder challenges and policy recommendations.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hussain A Al-OmarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh, Zip Code 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim A AljuffaliDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Oriol Solà-MoralesHiTT Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCapacity building exercises are important to increase understanding of healthcare processes by key stakeholders, and to facilitate open discussions to build consensus. This study explored the views of a multi-stakeholder group of local Saudi experts on possible value elements that could be important for health technology assessment (HTA) processes and methods regarding pharmaceutical products in Saudi Arabia ('value drivers').

methodsA diversified group of local experts were invited to a two-day capacity building workshop from 18 to 19 December 2019 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Information regarding the participants' demographic and educational/professional background, along with their self-assessed knowledge and experience of HTAs and the concept of value in the pharmaceutical market was collected. For each of 22 value drivers identified during a targeted literature search, participants were asked either to 'opt out' of its consideration for future HTA assessments, or rate it from 1 to 10 (low-high) on feasibility and acceptability.

resultsEfficacy and safety were the highest rated value drivers for acceptability and feasibility. Explicit cost-effectiveness thresholds had the lowest ratings for acceptability and feasibility. Participants highlighted data availability and accuracy as a potential challenge to HTA implementation in Saudi Arabia.

conclusionsParticipants valued a pharmaceutical product's efficacy and safety alongside the consideration of disease characteristics for HTA processes. Participants also valued a binding HTA recommendation and the use of local real-world evidence, where available, to support HTA submissions.

Indexed as

capacity buildinghealth technology assessmentpharmaceutical productspolicySaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID34588840
PMCPMC8463512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.