Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34588549›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A Random Forest approach to identify metrics that best predict match outcome and player ranking in the esport Rocket League.

Tim D Smithies, Mark J Campbell, Niall Ramsbottom, Adam J Toth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tim D SmithiesDepartment of Physical Education & Sport Science, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland. Tim.Smithies@ul.ie.ORCID 0000-0002-8026-5134
Mark J CampbellDepartment of Physical Education & Sport Science, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9607-7675
Niall RamsbottomDepartment of Physical Education & Sport Science, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2992-6136
Adam J TothDepartment of Physical Education & Sport Science, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2193-0138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Notational analysis is a popular tool for understanding what constitutes optimal performance in traditional sports. However, this approach has been seldom used in esports. The popular esport "Rocket League" is an ideal candidate for notational analysis due to the availability of an online repository containing data from millions of matches. The purpose of this study was to use Random Forest models to identify in-match metrics that predicted match outcome (performance indicators or "PIs") and/or in-game player rank (rank indicators or "RIs"). We evaluated match data from 21,588 Rocket League matches involving players from four different ranks. Upon identifying goal difference (GD) as a suitable outcome measure for Rocket League match performance, Random Forest models were used alongside accompanying variable importance methods to identify metrics that were PIs or RIs. We found shots taken, shots conceded, saves made, and time spent goalside of the ball to be the most important PIs, and time spent at supersonic speed, time spent on the ground, shots conceded and time spent goalside of the ball to be the most important RIs. This work is the first to use Random Forest learning algorithms to highlight the most critical PIs and RIs in a prominent esport.

Identifiers

PMID34588549
PMCPMC8481284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.