Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34588507›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A machine learning approach for single cell interphase cell cycle staging.

Hemaxi Narotamo, Maria Sofia Fernandes, Ana Margarida Moreira, Soraia Melo, Raquel Seruca, Margarida Silveira, João Miguel Sanches

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hemaxi Narotamo *Institute for Systems and Robotics (ISR), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Maria Sofia Fernandes *Epithelial Interactions in Cancer (EPIC) Group, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Ana Margarida MoreiraEpithelial Interactions in Cancer (EPIC) Group, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Soraia MeloEpithelial Interactions in Cancer (EPIC) Group, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Raquel SerucaEpithelial Interactions in Cancer (EPIC) Group, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. rseruca@ipatimup.pt.
Margarida SilveiraInstitute for Systems and Robotics (ISR), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
João Miguel SanchesInstitute for Systems and Robotics (ISR), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell nucleus is a tightly regulated organelle and its architectural structure is dynamically orchestrated to maintain normal cell function. Indeed, fluctuations in nuclear size and shape are known to occur during the cell cycle and alterations in nuclear morphology are also hallmarks of many diseases including cancer. Regrettably, automated reliable tools for cell cycle staging at single cell level using in situ images are still limited. It is therefore urgent to establish accurate strategies combining bioimaging with high-content image analysis for a bona fide classification. In this study we developed a supervised machine learning method for interphase cell cycle staging of individual adherent cells using in situ fluorescence images of nuclei stained with DAPI. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier operated over normalized nuclear features using more than 3500 DAPI stained nuclei. Molecular ground truth labels were obtained by automatic image processing using fluorescent ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (Fucci) technology. An average F1-Score of 87.7% was achieved with this framework. Furthermore, the method was validated on distinct cell types reaching recall values higher than 89%. Our method is a robust approach to identify cells in G

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSupport Vector MachineAnimalsCell LineCell NucleusDatasets as TopicHumansInterphaseIntravital MicroscopyMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID34588507
PMCPMC8481278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.