Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34588188›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2021

One chance to get it right: improving clinical handovers for better symptom control at the end of life.

Gabriel Goldraij, Vilma Adriana Tripodoro, Melisa Aloisio, Sandra Analía Castro, Christina Gerlach, Catriona Rachel Mayland, Dagny Faksvåg Haugen, ERANet-LAC CODE Project Group, ERANet-LAC CODE project group

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03566732 (International Care Of the Dying Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03566732 completednot on this map

International Care Of the Dying Evaluation (CODE): Quality of Care for Cancer Patients as Perceived by Bereaved Relatives

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2017 to 2018Enrolled914ConditionsNeoplasms, Bereavement, Quality of Life
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gabriel GoldraijInternal Medicine/Palliative Care Program, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina gabriel.goldraij@hospitalprivado.com.ar.ORCID 0000-0002-6665-6550
Vilma Adriana TripodoroDepartment of Palliative Care, Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas Alfredo Lanari, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Melisa AloisioInstituto Universitario de Ciencias Biomédicas de Córdoba (IUCBC), Córdoba, Argentina.
Sandra Analía CastroPalliative Care Program, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Christina GerlachInterdisciplinary Palliative Care Unit, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Catriona Rachel MaylandDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Dagny Faksvåg HaugenRegional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
ERANet-LAC CODE Project Group
ERANet-LAC CODE project group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor communication contributes to morbidity and mortality, not only in general medical care but also at the end oflife. This leads to issues relating to symptom control and quality of care. As part of an international project focused on bereaved relatives' perceptions about quality of end-of-life care, we undertook a quality improvement (QI) project in a general hospital in Córdoba city, Argentina.By using two iterative QI cycles, we launched an educational process and introduced a clinical mnemonic tool, I-PASS, during ward handovers. The introduction of the handover tool was intended to improve out-of-hours care.Our clinical outcome measure was ensuring comfort in at least 60% of dying patients, as perceived by family carers, during night shifts in an oncology ward during the project period (March-May 2019). As process-based measures, we selected the proportion of staff completing the I-PASS course (target 60%) and using I-PASS in at least 60% of handovers. Participatory action research was the chosen method.During the study period, 13/16 dying patients were included. We received 23 reports from family carers about the level of patient comfort during the previous night.Sixty-five per cent of healthcare professionals completed the I-PASS training. The percentage of completed handovers increased from 60% in the first Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle to 68% in the second one.The proportion of positive reports about patient comfort increased from 63% (end of the first PDSA cycle) to 87% (last iterative analysis after 3 months). Moreover, positive responses to 'Did doctors and nurses do enough for the patient to be comfortable during the night?' increased from 75% to 100% between the first and the second QI cycle.In conclusion, we achieved the successful introduction and staff training for use of the I-PASS tool. This led to improved perceptions by family carers, about comfort for dying patients.

Indexed as

Patient HandoffTerminal CareDeathHumansPatient ComfortQuality Improvementpain managementpalliative carepatient safetyquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID34588188
PMCPMC8483039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.