Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34587935›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2021

The attitudes of psychiatric patients towards COVID-19 vaccination in China: a cross-sectional study.

Xin Ren, Fang Shen, Yan Gui, Weixin Wang, Baoping Xing, Wanli Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xin RenTongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Mental Health Center of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Fang ShenTongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Mental Health Center of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yan GuiTongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Mental Health Center of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Weixin WangTongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Mental Health Center of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Baoping XingTongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Mental Health Center of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Wanli HuangTongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Mental Health Center of Zhejiang Province, No. 234 Gucui Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. wanlih12@outlook.com.
Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has become a global health catastrophe. By far, there has been no specific antiviral treatment for COVID-19. Developing a vaccine against COVID-19 appeared to be the most cost-effective strategy to stop the repeated outbreak. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes of psychiatric patients with regards to COVID-19 vaccination and potential factors that might influence their decision-making process.

methodsPsychiatric patients participated in this cross-sectional survey in China. Family caregivers, usually a guardian or next of kin completed the questionnaire when the patient is unable to consent. Data was collected via an online self-administered questionnaire. This questionnaire focused on four main attributes: (1) sociology-demographic characteristics, such as age and sex; (2) questions relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as perceived risk of COVID-19; (3) Flu vaccination history; and (4) attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination and affected factors, such as preferred vaccine type and vaccination site. The associated factors that influenced vaccination acceptance were analyzed by Chi-square analysis and binary logistic regression.

resultsIn total, 416 individuals were recruited, from which 408: 229 patients and 179 family caregivers completed the online survey (response rate: 98.1%). 78.7% of the participants (178 patients and 143 family caregivers) said they intended to receive vaccination once the COVID-19 vaccine became available on the market. Our results showed that participants would have a greater likelihood of joining the COVID-9 immunization programme if the people they knew (community residents or their friends and relatives) presented with high vaccine coverage (OR = 0.24; 95% CI:0.09-0.59). If the pandemic returns, participants were also more likely to accept vaccination (OR = 0.21; 95% CI:0.07-0.62). Moreover, those who believed that the vaccination was an important way to control the COVID-19 pandemic also showed a tendency to receive vaccination (OR = 0.21; 95% CI:0.11-0.40). For those who did not intend to get vaccinated either for themselves or their psychiatric family member, the safety of vaccine was their main concern (71.3%).

conclusionsThis study showed a high acceptance rate for COVID-19 vaccination amongst psychiatric patients, while worries about the safety of vaccine led to refusal towards vaccination. To increase vaccination uptake amongst this vulnerable group, the public health messaging should include updated vaccination coverage in local communities, and the number of newly COVID-19 infected cases. Specific information about vaccine safety concerning psychiatric patients; as well as the importance of vaccination in controlling the pandemic should be explained in detail.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAttitudeChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesAttitudesCOVID-19Family caregiverPsychiatric patientVaccination

Identifiers

PMID34587935
PMCPMC8479711
OpenAlexW3203653966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.