ArticleHaematologica2022
Utility of plasma cell-free DNA for
Article in Haematologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical decisions in clonal hematopoiesis: a contemporary review for clinicians.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Accurate and reliable detection of clonal hematopoiesis in plasma cell-free DNA.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Non-invasive prenatal test identifies circulating cell-free DNA chromosomal abnormalities derived from clonal hematopoiesis in aggressive hematological malignancies.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Article
- Liquid biopsies and minimal residual disease in myeloid malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Expanding approaches to detect clonal hematopoiesis.Haematologica · 2022Article
- Molecular and cytogenetic characterization of myelodysplastic syndromes in cell-free DNA.Blood advances · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although cell-free DNA (cfDNA) tests have emerged as a potential non-invasive alternative to bone marrow biopsies for monitoring clonal hematopoiesis in hematologic diseases, whether commercial cfDNA assays can be implemented for the detection and quantification of de novo clonal hematopoiesis in place of blood cells is uncertain. In this study, peripheral plasma cfDNA samples available from patients with aplastic anemia (n=25) or myelodysplastic syndromes (n=27) and a healthy cohort (n=107) were screened for somatic variants in genes related to hematologic malignancies using a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified panel. Results were further compared to DNA sequencing of matched blood cells. In reported results, 85% of healthy subjects, 36% of patients with aplastic anemia and 74% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes were found to have somatic cfDNA variants, most frequently in DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1 and SF3B1. However, concordance between cfDNA and blood cell findings was poor for the detection of clonal hematopoiesis when the allele frequency of the variants was <10%, which was mostly observed in the healthy and aplastic anemia cohorts but not in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. After filtering data for potential artifacts due to low variant allele frequency and sequencing depth, the frequency of clonal hematopoiesis in cfDNA from healthy individuals and patients with aplastic anemia decreased to 52% and 20%, respectively. cfDNA and matched blood cells were not interchangeable for tracking changes in allele burdens as their agreement by Bland-Altman analysis was poor. A commercial cfDNA assay had good performance for de novo detection of clonal hematopoiesis in myelodysplastic syndromes, but showed no advantage over blood cells in diseases with low allele burdens or in healthy individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.