Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34587552›Full record

ReviewTransplantation and cellular therapy2021

State of the CAR-T: Risk of Infections with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy and Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Responses.

Juliet Meir, Muhammad Abbas Abid, Muhammad Bilal Abid

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. CAR T-Cell Therapy for Rheumatic Diseases: What Does the Future Hold?BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Early and Late Toxicities of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Juliet MeirDepartment of Medicine, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York.
Muhammad Abbas AbidDepartment of Hematopathology & Microbiology, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Bilal AbidDivisions of Infectious Diseases and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Electronic address: bilal_abid@hotmail.com.
Medical College of Wisconsin · USWestchester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy has shown unprecedented response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. Although CAR-T therapy gives hope to heavily pretreated patients, the rapid commercialization and cumulative immunosuppression of this therapy predispose patients to infections for a prolonged period. CAR-T therapy poses distinctive short- and long-term toxicities and infection risks among patients who receive CAR T-cells after multiple prior treatments, often including hematopoietic cell transplantation. The acute toxicities include cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. The long-term B cell depletion, hypogammaglobulinemia, and cytopenia further predispose patients to severe infections and abrogate the remission success achieved by the living drug. These on-target-off-tumor toxicities deplete B-cells across the entire lineage and further diminish immune responses to vaccines. Early observational data suggest that patients with hematologic malignancies may not mount adequate humoral and cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. In this review, we summarize the immune compromising factors indigenous to CAR-T recipients. We discuss the immunogenic potential of different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for CAR-T recipients based on the differences in vaccine manufacturing platforms. Given the lack of data related to the safety and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in this distinctively immunosuppressed cohort, we summarize the infection risks associated with Food and Drug Administration-approved CAR-T constructs and the potential determinants of vaccine responses. The review further highlights the potential need for booster vaccine dosing and the promise for heterologous prime-boosting and other novel vaccine strategies in CAR-T recipients. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Indexed as

COVID-19Receptors, Chimeric AntigenCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR-T therapyCellular immunityCOVID-19Hematopoietic cell transplantationHumoral immunityImmunocompromisedmRNA vaccineNeutralizing antibodiesSARS-CoV-2Vaccine response

Identifiers

PMID34587552
PMCPMC8473073
OpenAlexW3203335968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.