Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34587350›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2021

Visual speech differentially modulates beta, theta, and high gamma bands in auditory cortex.

G Karthik, John Plass, Adriene M Beltz, Zhongming Liu, Marcia Grabowecky, Satoru Suzuki, William C Stacey, Vibhangini S Wasade, Vernon L Towle, James X Tao and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

G KarthikDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
John PlassDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Adriene M BeltzDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Zhongming LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Marcia GraboweckyDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Satoru SuzukiDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
William C StaceyDepartment of Neurology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Vibhangini S WasadeDepartment of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Vernon L TowleDepartment of Neurology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
James X TaoDepartment of Neurology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Shasha WuDepartment of Neurology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Naoum P IssaDepartment of Neurology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
David BrangDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2706-6777
University of Michigan · USUniversity of Chicago · USNorthwestern University · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Characterizing High Frequency Oscillations as an epilepsy biomarker with Big Data toolsR01NS094399 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STACEY, WILLIAM CHARLES · 2015 to 2025
$4.1M
Networks Underlying Visual Modulation of Speech PerceptionR00DC013828 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRANG, DAVID · 2016 to 2018
$747k
NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC013828NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech perception is a central component of social communication. Although principally an auditory process, accurate speech perception in everyday settings is supported by meaningful information extracted from visual cues. Visual speech modulates activity in cortical areas subserving auditory speech perception including the superior temporal gyrus (STG). However, it is unknown whether visual modulation of auditory processing is a unitary phenomenon or, rather, consists of multiple functionally distinct processes. To explore this question, we examined neural responses to audiovisual speech measured from intracranially implanted electrodes in 21 patients with epilepsy. We found that visual speech modulated auditory processes in the STG in multiple ways, eliciting temporally and spatially distinct patterns of activity that differed across frequency bands. In the theta band, visual speech suppressed the auditory response from before auditory speech onset to after auditory speech onset (-93 to 500 ms) most strongly in the posterior STG. In the beta band, suppression was seen in the anterior STG from -311 to -195 ms before auditory speech onset and in the middle STG from -195 to 235 ms after speech onset. In high gamma, visual speech enhanced the auditory response from -45 to 24 ms only in the posterior STG. We interpret the visual-induced changes prior to speech onset as reflecting crossmodal prediction of speech signals. In contrast, modulations after sound onset may reflect a decrease in sustained feedforward auditory activity. These results are consistent with models that posit multiple distinct mechanisms supporting audiovisual speech perception.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionHumansSpeechVisual PerceptionaudiovisualECoGiEEGintracranialmultisensorysEEGspeech

Identifiers

PMID34587350
PMCPMC8630510
OpenAlexW3204508198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.