Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34587249›Full record

ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2022

Anterior openbite malocclusion in adults.

David Gu, Brian Leroux, Sam Finkleman, Lauren Todoki, Geoffrey Greenlee, Veerasathpurush Allareddy, Cameron Jolley, Michael Vermette, Kyungsup Shin, Chung How Kau and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Postreatment stability of open bite in patients with permanent dentition. review].Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

David Gu
Brian Leroux
Sam Finkleman
Lauren Todoki
Geoffrey Greenlee
Veerasathpurush Allareddy
Cameron Jolley
Michael Vermette
Kyungsup Shin
Chung How Kau
Jaime de Jesus-Vinas
Calogero Dolce
National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group
Greg Huang
University of Washington · USIS practice · BENHTI - Concord's Community College · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

The National Dental PBRNU19DE022516 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2012 to 2018
$66.4M
The National Dental PBRN - Administrative CoreU19DE028717 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2019 to 2025
$23.5M
NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE022516NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE028717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate stability and satisfaction in adult anterior open bite (AOB) patients at least 9 months post-treatment, as well as patient and practitioner factors that may be associated with stability and satisfaction. MATERIALS AND

methodsPractitioners and their adult AOB patients were recruited through the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Data on patient and practitioner characteristics, treatment recommendations and factors were previously collected. Treatment stability was determined by assessing post-treatment intraoral photographs. Patient satisfaction was determined from post-treatment questionnaires. Treatment was categorized into aligners, fixed appliances, temporary anchorage devices, and orthognathic surgery. Extractions were also investigated. Retention type was categorized into vacuum-formed, Hawley-style, or bonded retainers, and regimens were classified as full-time or part-time wear.

resultsRetention data collected from 112 patients had a mean post-treatment time of 1.21 years. There were no statistically significant differences in stability between treatment groups. Depending on whether a qualitative index or a millimetric measure was employed, stability ranged from 65% to 89%. Extractions and less initial lower incisor proclination were associated with higher stability in patients treated with fixed appliances only. High satisfaction was reported by patients at retention. There were no clear differences in stability or satisfaction among retention types or regimens.

conclusionsThe stability of adult AOB orthodontic treatment was high, regardless of treatment or retainer modality. Satisfaction in adult AOB patients was high, regardless of retention type or regimen.

Indexed as

MalocclusionOpen BiteOrthognathic Surgical ProceduresAdultHumansIncisorOrthodontic Appliance DesignOrthodontic Appliances, FixedOrthodontic RetainersVacuumAnterior openbiteRetentionSatisfactionStability

Identifiers

PMID34587249
PMCPMC8691483
OpenAlexW3203381805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.