Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34587175›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership.

Lauren Cadel, Michelle Marcinow, Jane Sandercock, Penny Dowedoff, Sara J T Guilcher, Alies Maybee, Susan Law, Kerry Kuluski

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Meta-Research on the Science of Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Changes in healthcare engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A qualitative exploration of patient safety in a hospital setting in Spain: Policy and practice recommendations on patients' and companions' participation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Patient Educators.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lauren CadelInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6925-8163
Michelle MarcinowInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5214-7974
Jane SandercockInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0730-5742
Penny DowedoffInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Sara J T GuilcherLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alies MaybeePatient Partner, Canada.
Susan LawInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Kerry KuluskiInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6377-6653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on healthcare systems and care delivery, changing the context for patient and family engagement activities. Given the critical contribution of such activities in achieving health system quality goals, we undertook to address the question: What is known about work that has been done on patient engagement activities during the pandemic?

objectiveTo examine peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify the range of patient engagement activities, broadly defined (inclusive of engagement to support clinical care to partnerships in decision-making), occurring within health systems internationally during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as key barriers and facilitators for sustaining patient engagement activities during the pandemic.

methodsThe following databases were searched: Medline, Embase and LitCOVID; a search for grey literature focused on the websites of professional organizations. Articles were required to be specific to COVID-19, describe patient engagement activities, involve a healthcare organization and be published from March 2020 to September 2020. Data were extracted and managed using Microsoft Excel. A content analysis of findings was conducted.

resultsTwenty-nine articles were included. Few examples of more genuine partnership with patients were identified (such as co-design and organizational level decision making); most activities related to clinical level interactions (e.g. virtual consultations, remote appointments, family visits using technology and community outreach). Technology was leveraged in almost all reported studies to interact or connect with patients and families. Five main descriptive categories were identified: (1) Engagement through Virtual Care; (2) Engagement through Other Technology; (3) Engagement for Service Improvements/ Recommendations; (4) Factors Impacting Patient Engagement; and (5) Lessons Learned though Patient Engagement.

conclusionsEvidence of how healthcare systems and organizations stayed connected to patients and families during the pandemic was identified; the majority of activities involved direct care consultations via technology. Since this review was conducted over the first six months of the pandemic, more work is needed to unpack the spectrum of patient engagement activities, including how they may evolve over time and to explore the barriers and facilitators for sustaining activities during major disruptions like pandemics.

Indexed as

AdvertisingCOVID-19Decision MakingHumansPandemicsPatient ParticipationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34587175
PMCPMC8480845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.