Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34586944›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2021

A rare case of type II negative pressure pulmonary edema following extraction of inhaled peanuts in a 21-month-old boy.

Qin Li, Liang Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Negative pressure pulmonary edema (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qin LiDepartment of Respirology, Children's Hospital of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, China.
Liang ZhouDepartment of Respirology, Children's Hospital of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2415-6977
Hospital of Hebei Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, only one case of pediatric type II negative pressure pulmonary edema (NPPE) caused by removal of an endobronchial foreign body has been documented. We report another case of type II NPPE that developed after extraction of inhaled peanuts. A 21-month-old boy who presented with wheezing and intermittent cough for 1 month after eating peanuts was admitted to our department. A chest computed tomographic scan showed foreign bodies lodged in the right main bronchus. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed, and three pieces of peanuts were removed. Fifteen minutes after this procedure, the child grew restless and started coughing with frothy pink sputum. Tachypnea and rales were observed. A chest radiograph showed patchy opacification in both lungs, especially in the right lower zone, leading to the diagnosis of type II NPPE. Intravenous furosemide and dexamethasone were immediately administered, followed by non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure ventilation. Twelve hours later, the patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged home the following day. In conclusion, pediatric type II NPPE rapidly occurs following the relief of upper airway obstruction. Clinicians need to be aware of the acuteness and manifestations of type II NPPE to make an early diagnosis and initiate prompt treatment.

Indexed as

Foreign BodiesPulmonary EdemaArachisChildHumansInfantLungTracheafiberoptic bronchoscopyforeign body aspirationlungpediatric patientType II negative pressure pulmonary edemaupper airway obstruction

Identifiers

PMID34586944
PMCPMC8485296
OpenAlexW3203904201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.