ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021
Coronary flow quantification estimated by dynamic 320-detector CT angiography: validation by
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal image compression in cardiac computed tomography: impact of temporal super resolution and noise reduction for assessing left ventricular function.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- Dynamic coronary CT Angiography-Estimated coronary flow in Non-Obstructive, Plaque-free coronary Arteries: Association with dyslipidemia and diabetes.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesResting coronary flow index (rCFI) estimated by 320-detector low-dose dynamic coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is a direct flow quantification using intracoronary attenuation. We propose modified-rCFI from new protocol combining dynamic scan and standard CCTA using dose-modulation, and validate its consistency with quantitative values and ischemia depicted by
methods46 patients who underwent dynamic CCTA and NH
resultsrCFI and modified-rCFI had significant positive correlations with stress MBF and MFR. The optical cut-offs of rCFI and modified-rCFI of 0.39 and 0.61 could detect territories with MFR <2.0, with AUCs of 0.75 and 0.73, sensitivities of 48 and 34%, and specificities of 97 and 98%. Optimal cut-offs of rCFI and modified-rCFI distinguished ischemic segments from non-ischemic segments, with AUCs of 0.75 and 0.91, sensitivities of 53 and 50%, and specificities of 93 and 95%.
conclusionTwo types of rCFI correlated with quantitative values from NH ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: rCFI can contribute as additional functional test over standard CCTA in clinical work-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.