Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34586808›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2021

AlphaFold 2: Why It Works and Its Implications for Understanding the Relationships of Protein Sequence, Structure, and Function.

Jeffrey Skolnick, Mu Gao, Hongyi Zhou, Suresh Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bias in the AlphaFold3 prediction of ligand-induced domain motion in enzymes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeffrey SkolnickCenter for the Study of Systems Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1877-4958
Mu GaoCenter for the Study of Systems Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Hongyi ZhouCenter for the Study of Systems Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Suresh SinghTwilight Design, 4 Adams Road, Kendall Park, New Jersey 08824, United States.

Funding

Purchase of a GPU cluster for deep learning applications in protein-protein interaction and supercomplex prediction and biochemical literature annotation.R35GM118039 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI JEFFREY SKOLNICK · 2016 to 2026
$5.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AlphaFold 2 (AF2) was the star of CASP14, the last biannual structure prediction experiment. Using novel deep learning, AF2 predicted the structures of many difficult protein targets at or near experimental resolution. Here, we present our perspective of why AF2 works and show that it is a very sophisticated fold recognition algorithm that exploits the completeness of the library of single domain PDB structures. It has also learned local side chain packing rearrangements that enable it to refine proteins to high resolution. The benefits and limitations of its ability to predict the structures of many more proteins at or close to atomic detail are discussed.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingProteinsAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceProteins

Identifiers

PMID34586808
PMCPMC8592092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.