Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34586602›Full record

Trial reportDrugs2021

REal worlD Effectiveness and Safety of Mepolizumab in a Multicentric Spanish Cohort of Asthma Patients Stratified by Eosinophils: The REDES Study.

Christian Domingo Ribas, Teresa Carrillo Díaz, Marina Blanco Aparicio, Eva Martínez Moragón, David Banas Conejero, M Guadalupe Sánchez Herrero, REDES Study Group

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biologic agents licensed for severe asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Achieving remission in severe asthma.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  19. Improving patient outcomes: Mepolizumab's impact in IL-5-mediated diseases.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christian Domingo RibasServei de Pneumologia, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Parc Taulí s/n, Sabadell, 08208, Barcelona, Spain. cdomingo@tauli.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8358-773X
Teresa Carrillo DíazH. Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Marina Blanco AparicioH. Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Eva Martínez MoragónH. Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.
David Banas ConejeroSpecialty Care Medical Department, GlaxoSmithKline, Madrid, Spain.
M Guadalupe Sánchez HerreroSpecialty Care Medical Department, GlaxoSmithKline, Madrid, Spain.
REDES Study Group
GlaxoSmithKline (Spain) · ESUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ESComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESHospital Universitario Doctor Peset · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of mepolizumab is well documented in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA), although the stringent selection criteria adopted by SEA clinical trials limits the generalizability of results.

objectiveOur study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab in patients with SEA in Spain. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the rate of clinically significant asthma exacerbations 12 months after starting mepolizumab compared to the baseline rate in the 12 months prior to treatment. Patients were stratified by baseline blood eosinophil counts.

methodsWe conducted a multicentric observational cohort study of SEA patients treated with mepolizumab across 24 specialized hospital asthma units in Spain. Severe exacerbation rate, lung function, oral corticosteroid use (OCS) and asthma control test (ACT) were retrospectively collected and compared during the 12-month pre- and post-mepolizumab treatment. Adverse events were also investigated.

resultsA total of 318 patients with SEA were included (mean age: 56.6 years, 69.2% female). Exacerbation rates decreased by 77.5%, and 50.6% of patients did not suffer any exacerbations during the 12 months of treatment. The difference in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) pre- and post-bronchodilator after starting mepolizumab was 0.21 (0.46) L (95% CI 0.14-0.27) (p < 0.001). Exacerbations and lung function significantly improved across all eosinophil subgroups. Among the 98 patients on OCS, 47.8% were able to discontinue this treatment and the mean daily dose was decreased by 59.9%. The baseline ACT score was 14.1, increasing by a mean (SD) of 6.7 points (1.9) at 12 months. Adverse events related to mepolizumab were uncommon.

conclusionsThis real-world study of SEA patients confirms that mepolizumab is effective in reducing clinically meaningful exacerbations, improving lung function, and decreasing OCS dependence and mean OCS dose at 12 months, irrespective of baseline eosinophil counts.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaCohort StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugEosinophiliaEosinophilsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSpainAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedmepolizumab

Identifiers

PMID34586602
PMCPMC8550660
OpenAlexW3202229369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.