Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34586550›Full record

ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2023

An Updated Account on Parents' Use of and Attitudes Towards Time-Out.

Monica G Canning, Samantha Jugovac, Dave S Pasalich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Practitioners' Use and Acceptability of Time-Out.Child psychiatry and human development · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Therapist Anxious Distress and Avoidance of Implementing Time-Out.Child psychiatry and human development · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Time-Out with Young Children: A Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) Practitioner Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monica G CanningResearch School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Samantha JugovacResearch School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Dave S PasalichResearch School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia. dave.pasalich@anu.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time-out (TO) is a well-established technique for effectively managing childhood conduct problems, yet there is increasing controversy around its use. Using a mixed-methods approach, we investigated the impact of recent criticisms against TO on parents' use of and attitudes towards it. A community sample of parents (N = 297, M

Indexed as

ParentsProblem BehaviorAdultAttitudeChildChild BehaviorHumansParentingConduct problemsDisciplineParent–child relationshipParenting beliefsParent management training

Identifiers

PMID34586550
PMCPMC8479263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.