Trial reportJapanese journal of ophthalmology2021
An open-label, prospective, single-arm study of switching from infliximab to cyclosporine for refractory uveitis in patients with Behçet's disease in long-term remission.
Trial report in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Network meta-analysis of immunomodulatory therapies for Behçet's disease-associated uveitis: comparative evaluation of safety and efficacy profiles.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Pooled it
- Biological therapies in paediatric Behçet's disease: results of an international collaborative study by the PRES Vasculitis Working Party.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Decoding Behcet's Uveitis: an In-depth review of pathogenesis and therapeutic advances.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAlthough infliximab (IFX) decreases the risk of blindness due to refractory uveitis in patients with Behçet's disease (BD), there are no standard criteria for IFX switching or withdrawal. To evaluate the effect of IFX switching in patients with BD in long-term remission, a prospective, single-arm intervention trial was conducted, switching from IFX to cyclosporine A (CYA). STUDY
designA prospective open-label study.
methodsEligible patients met the following criteria: administration of IFX without concomitant immunosuppressants for more than 5 years with no episodes of ocular attacks, no retinal vasculitis on fluorescein fundus angiography, negative C-reactive protein in serum, and no extraocular lesions at the time of IFX withdrawal. CYA 5 mg/kg/day was administered from 6 weeks after IFX withdrawal. The primary outcome was the rate of readministration of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors at 1 year after IFX withdrawal.
resultsThree of 45 BD patients treated with IFX for refractory uveitis were included in the study. At 1 year after withdrawal of IFX, no patient had experienced any ocular attacks or needed readministation of IFX. However, extraocular lesions, such as recurrent oral ulcers, folliculitis, and recurrent fevers, occurred in all patients. Liver or renal dysfunction, which may have been caused by CYA, was also observed in all patients.
conclusionsAlthough no ocular attacks were observed for at least 1 year after IFX withdrawal, this prospective study indicates that IFX withdrawal should be considered carefully, even for patients in long term remission of ocular and extraocular lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.