Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34586517›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2021

Dietary Insights in Neurological Diseases.

Sergio A Ramírez-Salazar, Cherie Herren, Jessica McCartney, Jorge G Ortiz García

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sergio A Ramírez-SalazarDepartment of Neurology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 920 Stanton L. Young Blvd. Suite 2040, OK, 73104, Oklahoma City, USA.
Cherie HerrenDepartment of Neurology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 920 Stanton L. Young Blvd. Suite 2040, OK, 73104, Oklahoma City, USA.
Jessica McCartneyFood and Nutrition Services, University of Oklahoma Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Jorge G Ortiz GarcíaDepartment of Neurology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 920 Stanton L. Young Blvd. Suite 2040, OK, 73104, Oklahoma City, USA. jorge-ortizgarcia@ouhsc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDietary interventions may play a role in the pathophysiology of common neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, stroke, migraines, multiple sclerosis, and epilepsy. This article describes the most common and impactful dietary regimens for commonly encountered neurological disorders. RECENT

findingsPlant-based, low-fat, high-fiber diets, rich in antioxidants and other lifestyle interventions may reduce the burden and disability of common neurological disorders. The ketogenic diet, the diet of choice for the treatment of refractory epilepsy, is such an example. Diverse neurological disorders demonstrate several common pathophysiological mechanisms including increased oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and disrupted metabolism. Dietary interventions can potentially influence these pathophysiological processes and thus favorably alter clinical outcomes. Adequate dietary choices should be considered as part of a continuum of healthy lifestyle choices.

Indexed as

Diet, KetogenicDrug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsyMigraine DisordersDietHumansDietary interventionsEpilepsyMigraineMultiple sclerosisNeurodegenerative diseasesNutritionStroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.