Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34586511›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2022

[PARPACT: Paramedic Palliative Care Test : Validation of a questionnaire to assess palliative care knowledge and self-efficacy expectations of paramedics].

D Chwallek, A Schweda, M Neukirchen, J Hense, J Schwartz, B Mallmann, M Teufel, M Schuler, Mitra Tewes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

D ChwallekWestdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Innere Klinik (Tumorforschung), Universitätsklinikum Essen, 45122, Essen, Deutschland.
A SchwedaKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
M NeukirchenKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Palliativmedizin, CIO Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine Universität, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
J HenseWestdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Innere Klinik (Tumorforschung), Universitätsklinikum Essen, 45122, Essen, Deutschland.
J SchwartzKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Palliativmedizin, CIO Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine Universität, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
B MallmannUniversitätsklinikum Essen, 45122, Essen, Deutschland.
M TeufelKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, LVR-Klinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
M SchulerWestdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Innere Klinik (Tumorforschung), Universitätsklinikum Essen, 45122, Essen, Deutschland.
Mitra TewesWestdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Innere Klinik (Tumorforschung), Universitätsklinikum Essen, 45122, Essen, Deutschland. mitra.tewes@uk-essen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the large number of palliative patients cared for by the emergency services, education and training in palliative care topics are playing an increasingly important role. To support decision-making in an emergency setting a palliative or emergency card has been introduced in many cities.

objectivesTo assess the success of educational interventions and the effect of the palliative or emergency card, a questionnaire was developed and validated to determine palliative knowledge and palliative self-efficacy expectations in the emergency services. MATERIALS AND

methodsA Delphi process was applied for development and content validation. Factor analysis was used for construct validation. Criterion validity was assessed with the help of 22 nurses specially trained in palliative care. Reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha as a measure of internal consistency.

resultsIn all, 291 of 750 paramedics participated in the voluntary survey. After completion of the Delphi process, there was consensus that the important topics of pain, dyspnea, sedation, end-of-life care, euthanasia, and legal aspects were covered in the questionnaire. Factor analysis was in favor of a six-factor solution. Criterion validation revealed a significant difference in palliative knowledge between palliative care nurses (M

conclusionsThe Paramedic Palliative Care Test (PARPACT) is a validated measurement tool for testing educational interventions in paramedicine.

Indexed as

Palliative CareSelf EfficacyAllied Health PersonnelHumansMotivationReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesEmergency servicesmeasurement toolPalliative CarePalliative educationValidation

Identifiers

PMID34586511
PMCPMC9512857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.