Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34586502›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2022

Survival rate and peri-implant evaluation of immediately loaded dental implants in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Carlos Alexandre Soares Andrade, João Lucas Carvalho Paz, Gabriel Simino de Melo, Nour Mahrouseh, Alessandro Lourenço Januário, Lucas Raineri Capeletti

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos Alexandre Soares AndradeFaculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hajdú-Bihar, Hungary. soares.andrade@med.unideb.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6056-425X
João Lucas Carvalho PazDepartment of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Gabriel Simino de MeloFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Postgraduate Department, São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nour MahrousehFaculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hajdú-Bihar, Hungary.
Alessandro Lourenço JanuárioDepartment of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Instituto Aria, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Lucas Raineri CapelettiDepartment of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Instituto Aria, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
University of Debrecen · HUFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the survival rate, success rate, and peri-implant biological changes of immediately loaded dental implants (ILs) placed in type 2 diabetic patients (DM2). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe present study was registered on PROSPERO and followed the PRISMA checklist. The search was performed by the first reviewer in January 2021. The electronic databases used were MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane, BVS, Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO, and gray literature. The risk of bias analysis was performed using an instrument from the Joanna Briggs Institute.

resultsA total of 3566 titles and abstracts were obtained. The qualitative synthesis included 7 studies, while the quantitative synthesis included 5 studies. The meta-analysis of IL in individuals with DM2 compared to nondiabetic individuals showed no significant difference among the groups regarding the survival rate of dental implants (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.96-1.04; p = 0.91; I

conclusionsType 2 diabetes mellitus does not seem to be a risk factor for immediately loaded implants if the glycemic level is controlled, the oral hygiene is satisfactory, and the technical steps are strictly followed. Clinical relevance Rehabilitation in diabetic individuals is more common due to the highest prevalence of edentulism in this population. It is essential to establish appropriate protocols for loading dental implants.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Immediate Dental Implant LoadingDental Implantation, EndosseousDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedDental Restoration FailureHumansSurvival RateDental ImplantsDiabetes MellitusEdentulismImmediate Dental Implant Loading

Identifiers

PMID34586502
PMCPMC8479496
OpenAlexW3204375973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.