ReviewDysphagia2022
Accuracy of Acoustic Evaluation of Swallowing as a Diagnostic Method of Dysphagia in Individuals Affected by Stroke: Preliminary Analysis.
Review in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sounding out Dysphagia: Using a Digital Stethoscope to Assess Audiometric Differences in Swallowing.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After a stroke, more than half of the patients have some kind of disability, and dysphagia is frequently found. Cervical auscultation by Doppler sonar is an innovative technique with gain of credibility in the clinical evaluation of swallowing. To verify the diagnostic accuracy of Doppler sonar along with the DeglutiSom® software as an auxiliary method in the evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients after stroke. The research is a cross-sectional, uncontrolled, blind, quantitative study with systematic random sampling. Patients from inpatient and outpatient units of a reference hospital with a stroke care unit were concomitantly submitted to both Doppler sonar and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES®). Seventy-three audio files collected from 26 patients through Doppler sonar were analyzed using DeglutiSom® software and confronted with the FEES® report, regarding three food consistencies offered to them during the exam. The study showed that the Doppler sonar correctly identified, among all the analyzed files, those that actually presented tracheal aspiration as well as it effectively identified patients who did not aspirate. The Youden index of 0.91 corroborates this information, showing a promising accuracy in detecting tracheal aspiration in the studied sample. The study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of Doppler sonar, showing that it can be used as a valuable tool in the diagnosis of tracheal aspiration in patients after stroke. It is important to emphasize that the identification of residue by this method requires further studies. Also, larger sample size and more than one blind evaluator should be considered in future researches to increase the reliability of the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.