ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
Deep learning-based endoscopic anatomy classification: an accelerated approach for data preparation and model validation.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- SIG-CFFNet: Structural Information-Guided Cascaded Feature Fusion Network for Gastrointestinal Anatomy Classification.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- GastroHUN an Endoscopy Dataset of Complete Systematic Screening Protocol for the Stomach.Scientific data · 2025Article
- A Multi-task Neural Network for Image Recognition in Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Preparing Well for Esophageal Endoscopic Detection Using a Hybrid Model and Transfer Learning.Cancers · 2023Article
- Deep learning site classification model for automated photodocumentation in upper GI endoscopy (with video).iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2023Article
- Chemoprevention of Colitis-Associated Dysplasia or Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Gut and liver · 2022Review
- Development and validation of a deep learning-based algorithm for colonoscopy quality assessment.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Roadmap from Technology Development to Clinical Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Forrest Classification for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer: A New Look at the Old Endoscopic Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Nomogram for Predicting Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery during the Endoscopic Resection of Subepithelial Tumors of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhotodocumentation during endoscopy procedures is one of the indicators for endoscopy performance quality; however, this indicator is difficult to measure and audit in the endoscopy unit. Emerging artificial intelligence technology may solve this problem, which requires a large amount of material for model development. We developed a deep learning-based endoscopic anatomy classification system through convolutional neural networks with an accelerated data preparation approach. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe retrospectively collected 8,041 images from esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) procedures and labeled them using two experts for nine anatomical locations of the upper gastrointestinal tract. A base model for EGD image multiclass classification was first developed, and an additional 6,091 images were enrolled and classified by the base model. A total of 5,963 images were manually confirmed and added to develop the subsequent enhanced model. Additional internal and external endoscopy image datasets were used to test the model performance.
resultsThe base model achieved total accuracy of 96.29%. For the enhanced model, the total accuracy was 96.64%. The overall accuracy improved with the enhanced model compared with the base model for the internal test dataset without narrowband images (93.05% vs. 91.25%, p < 0.01) or with narrowband images (92.74% vs. 90.46%, p < 0.01). The total accuracy was 92.56% of the enhanced model on the external test dataset.
conclusionsWe constructed a deep learning-based model with an accelerated approach that can be used for quality control in endoscopy units. The model was also validated with both internal and external datasets with high accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34586491What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.