Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34586465›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Evaluation of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer before primary treatment: correlation between tumour burden assessed by [

Ariel Glickman, Pilar Paredes, Núria Carreras-Diéguez, Aida Niñerola-Baizán, Lydia Gaba, Jaume Pahisa, Pere Fusté, Marta Del Pino, Berta Díaz-Feijóo, Eduardo González-Bosquet and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparative analysis ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predicting epithelial ovarian cancer prognosis: correlation of posttreatmentQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ariel GlickmanGynaecologic Oncology Unit, Institut Clínic de GinecologiaObstetrícia i Neonatologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pilar ParedesDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. pparedes@clinic.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8097-9217
Núria Carreras-DiéguezGynaecologic Oncology Unit, Institut Clínic de GinecologiaObstetrícia i Neonatologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Aida Niñerola-BaizánDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Lydia GabaInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Jaume PahisaGynaecologic Oncology Unit, Institut Clínic de GinecologiaObstetrícia i Neonatologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pere FustéGynaecologic Oncology Unit, Institut Clínic de GinecologiaObstetrícia i Neonatologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta Del PinoGynaecologic Oncology Unit, Institut Clínic de GinecologiaObstetrícia i Neonatologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Berta Díaz-FeijóoGynaecologic Oncology Unit, Institut Clínic de GinecologiaObstetrícia i Neonatologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Eduardo González-BosquetGynaecologic Oncology Unit, Institut Clínic de GinecologiaObstetrícia i Neonatologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Núria AgustíGynaecologic Oncology Unit, Institut Clínic de GinecologiaObstetrícia i Neonatologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Nuria Sánchez-IzquierdoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
David FusterDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Andrés PerissinottiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Inmaculada RomeroDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Esther Fernández-GalánDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Biomedical Diagnostic Centre, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep Lluís CarrascoBiostatistics, Department of Basic Clinical Practice, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Blanca Gil-IbáñezGynecologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Aureli TornéGynaecologic Oncology Unit, Institut Clínic de GinecologiaObstetrícia i Neonatologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESBiomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAccurate assessment of disease extent is required to select the best primary treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Estimation of tumour burden is challenging and it is usually performed by means of a surgical procedure. Imaging techniques and tumour markers can help to estimate tumour burden non-invasively. 2-[

methodsWe included 66 patients who underwent 2-[

resultswb_MTV and wb_TLG were found to be significantly correlated with serum CA125 and HE4 concentrations. The strongest correlation was observed between HE4 and wb_MTV40 (r = 0.62, p < 0.001). Pearson's correlation coefficients between peritoneal carcinomatosis MTV40 and tumour markers were 0.61 (p < 0.0001) and 0.29 (p = 0.02) for HE4 and CA125 respectively. None of these tumour markers showed a positive correlation with tumour load outside the abdominal cavity assessed by volumetric parameters.

conclusionHE4 performs better than CA125 to predict metabolic tumour burden in high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer before primary treatment. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT volumetric parameters arise as feasible tools for the objective assessment of tumour load and its anatomical distribution. These results support the usefulness of HE4 and PET/CT to improve the stratification of these patients in clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • In patients with high-grade advanced ovarian epithelial carcinoma, both CA125 and HE4 correlate to whole-body tumour burden assessed by PET/CT before primary treatment. • HE4 estimates peritoneal disease much better than CA125. • PET/CT volumetric parameters arise as feasible tools for the objective assessment of tumour load and its anatomical distribution.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Ovarian NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialHumansPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesTumor BurdenBiomarkers, TumorFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsHuman epididymis protein 4Ovarian epithelial carcinomaPositron emission tomographyTumour biomarkers, CA-125 antigenTumour burden

Identifiers

PMID34586465
OpenAlexW3202116143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.