Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34586065›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Profiling sensory neuron microenvironment after peripheral and central axon injury reveals key pathways for neural repair.

Oshri Avraham, Rui Feng, Eric Edward Ewan, Justin Rustenhoven, Guoyan Zhao, Valeria Cavalli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Glial cells in neuropathic pain.Physiological reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oshri AvrahamDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States.
Rui FengDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States.
Eric Edward EwanDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States.
Justin RustenhovenDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States.
Guoyan ZhaoDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5615-6774
Valeria CavalliDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9978-050X
Hope Center for Neurological Disorders · US

Funding

Multicellular Mechanisms Driving Axon RegenerationR35NS122260 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Valeria Cavalli · 2021 to 2026
$4.8M
Functional role of satellite glial cells in axon regenerationR01NS111719 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CAVALLI, VALERIA · 2020 to 2021
$885k
Unraveling the transcriptional response of sensory neurons to spinal cord injury at the single cell levelR21NS115492 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CAVALLI, VALERIA · 2020 to 2020
$433k
Define molecular events driving selective neuronal death in multiple neurodegenerative diseases by snRNA-seqR03AG070474 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI XU, JINBIN, ZHAO, GUOYAN · 2021 to 2022
$315k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111719NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS115492NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS122260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory neurons with cell bodies in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) represent a useful model to study axon regeneration. Whereas regeneration and functional recovery occurs after peripheral nerve injury, spinal cord injury or dorsal root injury is not followed by regenerative outcomes. Regeneration of sensory axons in peripheral nerves is not entirely cell autonomous. Whether the DRG microenvironment influences the different regenerative capacities after injury to peripheral or central axons remains largely unknown. To answer this question, we performed a single-cell transcriptional profiling of mouse DRG in response to peripheral (sciatic nerve crush) and central axon injuries (dorsal root crush and spinal cord injury). Each cell type responded differently to the three types of injuries. All injuries increased the proportion of a cell type that shares features of both immune cells and glial cells. A distinct subset of satellite glial cells (SGC) appeared specifically in response to peripheral nerve injury. Activation of the PPARα signaling pathway in SGC, which promotes axon regeneration after peripheral nerve injury, failed to occur after central axon injuries. Treatment with the FDA-approved PPARα agonist fenofibrate increased axon regeneration after dorsal root injury. This study provides a map of the distinct DRG microenvironment responses to peripheral and central injuries at the single-cell level and highlights that manipulating non-neuronal cells could lead to avenues to promote functional recovery after CNS injuries or disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsBiomarkersCell ProliferationCellular MicroenvironmentFenofibrateGanglia, SpinalMacrophagesMicePPAR alphaSensory Receptor CellsSingle-Cell AnalysisSpinal Cord InjuriesBiomarkersFenofibratePPAR alphaaxon regenerationdorsal root ganglionmousenerve repairneurosciencesatellite glial cellssingle-cell RNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34586065
PMCPMC8480984
OpenAlexW3201742690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.