Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34585963›Full record

ArticlemSphere2021

Citizen Science Provides an Efficient Method for Broad-Scale Tick-Borne Pathogen Surveillance of Ixodes pacificus and Ixodes scapularis across the United States.

W Tanner Porter, Julie Wachara, Zachary A Barrand, Nathan C Nieto, Daniel J Salkeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

W Tanner PorterTranslational Genomics Research Institutegrid.250942.8, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2611-0924
Julie WacharaNorthern Arizona Universitygrid.261120.6, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Zachary A BarrandNorthern Arizona Universitygrid.261120.6, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Nathan C NietoNorthern Arizona Universitygrid.261120.6, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Daniel J SalkeldColorado State Universitygrid.47894.36, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1272-0721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick-borne diseases have expanded over the last 2 decades as a result of shifts in tick and pathogen distributions. These shifts have significantly increased the need for accurate portrayal of real-time pathogen distributions and prevalence in hopes of stemming increases in human morbidity. Traditionally, pathogen distribution and prevalence have been monitored through case reports or scientific collections of ticks or reservoir hosts, both of which have challenges that impact the extent, availability, and accuracy of these data. Citizen science tick collections and testing campaigns supplement these data and provide timely estimates of pathogen prevalence and distributions to help characterize and understand tick-borne disease threats to communities. We utilized our national citizen science tick collection and testing program to describe the distribution and prevalence of four

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumAnimal DistributionAnimalsBabesia microtiBorreliaCitizen ScienceHost-Pathogen InteractionsIxodesTick-Borne DiseasesUnited StatesAnaplasma phagocytophilumanaplasmosisBabesia microtibabesiosisBorreliaBorrelia burgdorferiBorrelia miyamotoiLyme diseaserelapsing fevertick-borne

Identifiers

PMID34585963
PMCPMC8550138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.