Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34585813›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2022

Towards robust glucose chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging in humans at 3 T: Arterial input function measurements and the effects of infusion time.

Anina Seidemo, Patrick M Lehmann, Anna Rydhög, Ronnie Wirestam, Gunther Helms, Yi Zhang, Nirbhay N Yadav, Pia C Sundgren, Peter C M van Zijl, Linda Knutsson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Imaging in translational cancer research.Cancer biology & medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Anina SeidemoDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0919-9680
Patrick M LehmannDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anna RydhögDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund and Malmö, Sweden.
Ronnie WirestamDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Gunther HelmsDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1371-5123
Yi ZhangKey Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8738-1851
Nirbhay N YadavRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Pia C SundgrenDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund and Malmö, Sweden.
Peter C M van ZijlRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Linda KnutssonDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4263-113X
Lund University · SEKennedy Krieger Institute · USJohns Hopkins University · USMinistry of Education · NZSkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

Development and Translation of D-glucose as a Diagnostic Agent for MRI of CancerR01EB019934 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2015 to 2019
$5.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown potential for tumor imaging using D-glucose as a biodegradable contrast agent. The DGE signal change is small at 3 T (around 1%) and accurate detection is hampered by motion. The intravenous D-glucose injection is associated with transient side effects that can indirectly generate subject movements. In this study, the aim was to study DGE arterial input functions (AIFs) in healthy volunteers at 3 T for different scanning protocols, as a step towards making the glucose chemical exchange saturation transfer (glucoCEST) protocol more robust. Two different infusion durations (1.5 and 4.0 min) and saturation frequency offsets (1.2 and 2.0 ppm) were used. The effect of subject motion on the DGE signal was studied by using motion estimates retrieved from standard retrospective motion correction to create pseudo-DGE maps, where the apparent DGE signal changes were entirely caused by motion. Furthermore, the DGE AIFs were compared with venous blood glucose levels. A significant difference (p = 0.03) between arterial baseline and postinfusion DGE signal was found after D-glucose infusion. The results indicate that the measured DGE AIF signal change depends on both motion and blood glucose concentration change, emphasizing the need for sufficient motion correction in glucoCEST imaging. Finally, we conclude that a longer infusion duration (e.g. 3-4 min) should preferably be used in glucoCEST experiments, because it can minimize the glucose infusion side effects without negatively affecting the DGE signal change.

Indexed as

AdultBlood GlucoseGlucoseHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTime FactorsBlood GlucoseGlucoseAIFCESTDGED-glucoseglucoCESTmotion correctionperfusion

Identifiers

PMID34585813
PMCPMC9128843
OpenAlexW3202823760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.