Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34585729›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2021

Classifying domain-specific text documents containing ambiguous keywords.

Kamran Karimi, Sergei Agalakov, Cheryl A Telmer, Thomas R Beatman, Troy J Pells, Bradley Im Arshinoff, Carolyn J Ku, Saoirse Foley, Veronica F Hinman, Charles A Ettensohn and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kamran KarimiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5733-9409
Sergei AgalakovDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Cheryl A TelmerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Thomas R BeatmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Troy J PellsDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2340-5356
Bradley Im ArshinoffDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Carolyn J KuDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Saoirse FoleyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1791-2837
Veronica F HinmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Charles A EttensohnDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Peter D VizeDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.

Funding

Xenbase: the Xenopus Model Organism KnowledgebaseP41HD064556 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI Aaron M Zorn · 2010 to 2026
$24.9M
Software Development to Enhance EchinobaseP41HD095831 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHARLES A. ETTENSOHN, Veronica Frances Hinman · 2018 to 2026
$6.5M
NICHD NIH HHS P41 HD064556NICHD NIH HHS P41 HD095831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A keyword-based search of comprehensive databases such as PubMed may return irrelevant papers, especially if the keywords are used in multiple fields of study. In such cases, domain experts (curators) need to verify the results and remove the irrelevant articles. Automating this filtering process will save time, but it has to be done well enough to ensure few relevant papers are rejected and few irrelevant papers are accepted. A good solution would be fast, work with the limited amount of data freely available (full paper body may be missing), handle ambiguous keywords and be as domain-neutral as possible. In this paper, we evaluate a number of classification algorithms for identifying a domain-specific set of papers about echinoderm species and show that the resulting tool satisfies most of the abovementioned requirements. Echinoderms consist of a number of very different organisms, including brittle stars, sea stars (starfish), sea urchins and sea cucumbers. While their taxonomic identifiers are specific, the common names are used in many other contexts, creating ambiguity and making a keyword search prone to error. We try classifiers using Linear, Naïve Bayes, Nearest Neighbor, Tree, SVM, Bagging, AdaBoost and Neural Network learning models and compare their performance. We show how effective the resulting classifiers are in filtering irrelevant articles returned from PubMed. The methodology used is more dependent on the good selection of training data and is a practical solution that can be applied to other fields of study facing similar challenges. Database URL: The code and date reported in this paper are freely available at http://xenbaseturbofrog.org/pub/Text-Topic-Classifier/.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEchinodermataAnimalsBayes TheoremDatabases, FactualPubMed

Identifiers

PMID34585729
PMCPMC8588847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.