ArticleClinical oral investigations2022
A temporospatial histomorphometric analysis of bone density adjacent to acid-etched self-tapping dental implants with an external hexagon connection in the female baboon.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of different thread configurations on hydrophilic implant stability. A split-mouth RCT.Brazilian dental journal · 2024Trial
- The effect of porous compliance bushings in a dental implant on the distribution of occlusal loads.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo characterize osseointegration as the percent of bone-implant contact (%BIC) along the surface (0.0 mm) as well as at surface profiles 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm lateral to the implant, determining any differences between early occlusally loaded and non-loaded implants. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn ten adult female baboons, 120 dental implants were randomly placed in opposing mandibular and maxillary locations. Eighty sites had two groups of healing (no load) of either 1 (n = 40) or 2 (n = 40) months leading to 3 months of functional loading. These sites received full acid-etched surface implants. The 40 control implants represented healing only periods (no load) for 1 (n = 10), 2 (n = 10), 4 (n = 10), and 5 (n = 10) months. These implants were of a vertically split surface texture design (acid-etched and machined). Block sections and photomicrographs were obtained. Blinded histometric analyses determined the %BIC via a superimposed template.
resultsThe unloaded groups (1, 2, and 4 months) had higher %BIC compared to the 5-month group (p < 0.0001). The loaded groups exhibited mean bone densities of 59.2% and 55.5% (1-month healing at 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm, respectively) and 61.0% and 57.1% (2-month healing at 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm, respectively) with no significant difference between healing time (p = 0.4118).
conclusionThere was a lateral increase in %BIC in the loaded compared to unloaded groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The decrease in bone densities at the 5-month unloaded group suggests that there is a critical earlier time period when dental implants should be placed into functional load.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.