Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34585227›Full record

ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2021

Using Digital Tools to Advance Alzheimer's Drug Trials During a Pandemic: The EU/US CTAD Task Force.

J Kaye, P Aisen, R Amariglio, R Au, C Ballard, M Carrillo, H Fillit, T Iwatsubo, G Jimenez-Maggiora, S Lovestone and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

J KayeJeffrey Kaye, Layton Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Center, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA, kaye@ohsu.edu.
P Aisen
R Amariglio
R Au
C Ballard
M Carrillo
H Fillit
T Iwatsubo
G Jimenez-Maggiora
S Lovestone
F Natanegara
K Papp
M E Soto
M Weiner
B Vellas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical studies worldwide. Digital technologies may help minimize disruptions by enabling remote assessment of subtle cognitive and functional changes over the course of the disease. The EU/US Clinical Trials in Alzheimer's Disease (CTAD) Task Force met virtually in November 2020 to explore the opportunities and challenges associated with the use of digital technologies in AD clinical research. While recognizing the potential of digital tools to accelerate clinical trials, improve the engagement of diverse populations, capture clinically meaningful data, and lower costs, questions remain regarding the stability, validity, generalizability, and reproducibility of digital data. Substantial concerns also exist regarding regulatory acceptance and privacy. Nonetheless, the Task Force supported further exploration of digital technologies through collaboration and data sharing, noting the need for standardization of digital readouts. They also concluded that while it may be premature to employ remote assessments for trials of novel experimental medications, remote studies of non-invasive, multi-domain approaches may be feasible at this time.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesBiomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19Digital TechnologyAlzheimer DiseaseEuropean UnionHumansUnited StatesAlzheimer’s diseaseclinical outcomesdigital toolsremote assessments

Identifiers

PMID34585227
PMCPMC8244451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.