Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34585141›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2021

Distinct neural correlates of linguistic demand and non-linguistic demand.

Ian A Quillen, Melodie Yen, Stephen M Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Right hemisphere language network plasticity in aphasia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Right Hemisphere Language Network Plasticity in Aphasia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. High-level language brain regions process sublexical regularities.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ian A QuillenDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Melodie YenDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Stephen M WilsonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Neural Correlates of Recovery from Aphasia After StrokeR01DC013270 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Stephen M Wilson, Michael R de Riesthal · 2014 to 2026
$6.3M
An Adaptive Semantic Paradigm for Valid and Reliable Language Mapping in AphasiaR21DC016080 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WILSON, STEPHEN M · 2017 to 2018
$435k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013270NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we investigated how the brain responds to task difficulty in linguistic and non-linguistic contexts. This is important for the interpretation of functional imaging studies of neuroplasticity in post-stroke aphasia, because of the inherent difficulty of matching or controlling task difficulty in studies with neurological populations. Twenty neurologically normal individuals were scanned with fMRI as they performed a linguistic task and a non-linguistic task, each of which had two levels of difficulty. Critically, the tasks were matched across domains (linguistic, non-linguistic) for accuracy and reaction time, such that the differences between the easy and difficult conditions were equivalent across domains. We found that non-linguistic demand modulated the same set of multiple demand (MD) regions that have been identified in many prior studies. In contrast, linguistic demand modulated MD regions to a much lesser extent, especially nodes belonging to the dorsal attention network. Linguistic demand modulated a subset of language regions, with the left inferior frontal gyrus most strongly modulated. The right hemisphere region homotopic to Broca's area was also modulated by linguistic but not non-linguistic demand. When linguistic demand was mapped relative to non-linguistic demand, we also observed domain by difficulty interactions in temporal language regions as well as a widespread bilateral semantic network. In sum, linguistic and non-linguistic demand have strikingly different neural correlates. These findings can be used to better interpret studies of patients recovering from aphasia. Some reported activations in these studies may reflect task performance differences, while others can be more confidently attributed to neuroplasticity.

Indexed as

accuracyaphasialinguistic demandmultiple demand networkreaction timetask difficulty

Identifiers

PMID34585141
PMCPMC8475781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.