Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34585063›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2021

Project Forward: A Population-Based Cohort Among Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancers.

Joel Milam, David R Freyer, Kimberly A Miller, Jessica Tobin, Katherine Y Wojcik, Cynthia N Ramirez, Anamara Ritt-Olson, Stefanie M Thomas, Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati, Michael Cousineau and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. JCO oncology practice · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Beyond depression: correlates of well-being in young adult survivors of childhood cancers.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Joel MilamDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9489-8015
David R FreyerDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-990X
Kimberly A MillerDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0742-3730
Jessica TobinDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8984-4298
Katherine Y WojcikPublic Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7044-9634
Cynthia N RamirezDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Anamara Ritt-OlsonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Stefanie M ThomasDepartment of Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3225-7129
Lourdes Baezconde-GarbanatiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Michael CousineauDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Denise ModjeskiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9634-3264
Sapna GuptaUSC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5305-0771
Ann S HamiltonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5898-2308

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MYLES G COCKBURN · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
Training grant for Cancer Control and EpidemiologyT32CA009492 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI PENTZ, MARY ANN · 1985 to 2019
$7.4M
Reducing racial/ethnic inequities in childhood cancer survivorshipR01MD007801 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MILAM, JOEL E · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009492NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD007801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) face increased risk of morbidity and are recommended to receive lifelong cancer-related follow-up care. Identifying factors associated with follow-up care can inform efforts to support the long-term health of CCS. Methods: Eligible CCS (diagnosed between 1996 and 2010) identified through the Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program responded to a self-report survey that assessed demographic, clinical, health-care engagement, and psychosocial risk and protective factors of recent (prior 2 years) cancer-related follow-up care. Weighted multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify correlates of care. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results: The overall response rate was 44.9%, with an analytical sample of n = 1106 (54.2% Hispanic; mean [SD] ages at survey, diagnosis, and years since diagnosis were 26.2 [4.9], 11.6 [5.4], and 14.5 [4.4] years, respectively). Fifty-seven percent reported a recent cancer-related visit, with lower rates reported among older survivors. Having insurance, more late effects, receipt of a written treatment summary, discussing long-term care needs with treating physician, knowledge of the need for long-term care, having a regular source of care, and higher health-care self-efficacy were statistically significantly associated with greater odds of recent follow-up care, whereas older age, Hispanic or Other ethnicity (vs non-Hispanic White), and years since diagnosis were associated with lower odds of recent care (all Conclusions: Age and ethnic disparities are observed in receipt of follow-up care among young adult CCS. Potential intervention targets include comprehensive, ongoing patient education; provision of written treatment summaries; and culturally tailored support to ensure equitable access to and the utilization of care.

Indexed as

AftercareCancer SurvivorsAdolescentAge FactorsChildCohort StudiesFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoHumansLogistic ModelsMaleNeoplasmsSelf ReportWhite PeopleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34585063
PMCPMC8462512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.