Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34584967›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2021

A new micro-forceps for endoscopic ultrasound-guided through-the-needle biopsy in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: Single center experience.

Serena Stigliano, Francesco Covotta, Francesco M Di Matteo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serena StiglianoOperative Endoscopy Department Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital Rome Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1225-8370
Francesco CovottaOperative Endoscopy Department Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital Rome Italy.
Francesco M Di MatteoOperative Endoscopy Department Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital Rome Italy.
Università Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided through-the-needle biopsy (TTNB) has improved the diagnostic algorithm of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs). Recently, a new through-the-needle micro-forceps device (Micro Bite, MTW Endoskopie Manufakture) has been introduced. The primary aim was to assess the safety and technical success of this new type of micro-forceps. The secondary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic role of EUS-TTNB.

methodsRetrospective study of consecutive patients receiving EUS-TTNB for the diagnosis of PCNs. Two micro-forceps were used: Moray Micro-forceps and Micro-Bite. Cystic fluid was collected for cytological analysis. Categorical variables were analyzed by Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables were analyzed by Student's

resultsForty-nine patients enrolled in the study (24% male; mean age 63 ± 14 years). TTNB was successfully performed in all patients. A diagnostic sample was obtained in 67.3% PCNs with TTNB compared with 36.7% with cyst fluid cytology (

conclusionsEUS-TTNB increases the diagnostic yield of PCNs. The new Micro-Bite could represent a valid alternative to the currently used Moray Micro-forceps, but its diagnostic rate is still suboptimal and further studies are needed.

Indexed as

endoscopic ultrasoundincreased diagnosismicro‐forcepsnew devicepancreatic cystic neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID34584967
PMCPMC8454469
OpenAlexW3195471609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.